Paranormal beliefs are driving the bias seen in the classification of ambiguous stimuli in perceptual decision-making paradigm

Author:

Narmashiri Abdolvahed1,Sohrabi Ahmad2,Hatami Javad3

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM)

2. Carleton University

3. University of Tehran

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies showed that paranormal believers are more tendency to find meaningful patterns in noise. This study develops these results via examine the sensory biases correlated to paranormal beliefs by using a perceptual decision-making task. To investigate whether paranormal believers differ in their sensitivity to recognizing significant face and house patterns in visual noise levels (from 40–70%), we used a face/house categorization task. The results show that paranormal believers are less efficient at discrimination between face and house stimulus in visual noise levels. It reflects a correlation between paranormal beliefs and a tendency for ambiguous stimuli. Our results revealed that paranormal beliefs are effective in face/house categorization task in the perceptual decision-making paradigm. Also, these findings show the effects of prior beliefs on cognitive processes and emphasize the influence of personal characteristics such as gender, age, and education on paranormal beliefs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Losing the big picture: How religion may control visual attention;Colzato LS;PLoS One,2008

2. Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans;Masuda T;Journal of personality and social psychology,2001

3. Helmholtz, H. L. Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. (Dover, 1962).

4. Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. in International Journal of Psychology. 258–258 (PSYCHOLOGY PRESS 27 CHURCH RD, HOVE BN3 2FA, EAST SUSSEX, ENGLAND).

5. Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli;Krummenacher P;Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3