Effective use of models in intelligence-to-decision workflows within and across One Health sectors

Author:

Pepin Kim1,Carlisle Keith2,Chipman Richard2,Cole Dana2,Anderson Dean3,Baker Michael4ORCID,Benschop Jackie5,Bunce Michael6,Binny Rachelle7,French Nigel5,Greenhalgh Suzie3,O'Neale Dion8ORCID,McDougall Scott9ORCID,Morgan Fraser7ORCID,Muellner Petra10,Murphy Emil11ORCID,Plank Michael12,Tompkins Daniel13,Hayman David5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

2. USDA

3. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research

4. University of Otago, Wellington

5. Massey University

6. Department of Conservation

7. Landcare Research

8. University of Auckland

9. Cognosco

10. Epi-interactive

11. Deer Industry New Zealand

12. University of Canterbury

13. Predator Free 2050 Limited

Abstract

Abstract Decision-makers in public service face uncertainty. Operational management or policy decisions need to be made about system-level ecological and sociological processes that are complex, poorly understood, and change over time. Relying on intuition, evidence, and experience for robust decision-making is challenging without a formal assimilation of these elements (a model), especially when the decision needs to consider potential impacts if an action is or is not taken. Models can provide assistance to this challenge, but effective use of modeling tools in decision-making can be difficult due to lack of trust, expertise, and transparency and consistency in modeling methods and results. We conducted 41 semi-structured interviews of researchers, operational managers, and policy decision-makers with direct experience in intelligence-to-decision workflows involving models within and across human health, animal health, or environmental sectors (One Health sectors). Qualitative analysis of the interview data reveals important ingredients for effective development and use of quantitative models in informing management or policy decisions in One Health sectors. Two of the priorities we identified for implementing improved workflows include establishing different standards for development of modeling intelligence before or after decisions are made and investment in knowledge brokers with modeling expertise working in teams with decision-makers. These and other priorities we identified are important considerations for developers and users of modeling intelligence in a broad range of institutional contexts.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference27 articles.

1. 1. Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental models and human reasoning. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 18243–18250, doi:10.1073/pnas.1012933107 (2010).

2. 2. Berger, L. et al. Rational policymaking during a pandemic. P Natl Acad Sci USA 118, doi:ARTN e2012704118

3. 10. 1073/pnas.2012704118 (2021). 3 Li, S. L. et al. Essential information: Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks. P Natl Acad Sci USA 114, 5659–5664, doi:10.1073/pnas.1617482114 (2017). 4 Hemming, V. et al. An introduction to decision science for conservation. Conserv Biol 36, doi:10.1111/cobi.13868 (2022). 5 Chen, Z., Lemey, P. & Yu, H. Approaches and challenges to inferring the geographical source of infectious disease outbreaks using genomic data. Lancet Microbe, doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00296-3 (2023). 6 Elderd, B. D., Dukic, V. M. & Dwyer, G. Uncertainty in predictions of disease spread and public health responses to bioterrorism and emerging diseases. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 15693–15697, doi:10.1073/pnas.0600816103 (2006). 7 Pepin, K. M. et al. Optimizing management of invasions in an uncertain world using dynamic spatial models. Ecol Appl 32, doi:ARTN e2628

4. 10. 1002/eap.2628 (2022). 8 Bedson, J. et al. A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors. Nat Hum Behav 5, 834–846, doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01136-2 (2021). 9 Adisasmito, W. B. et al. One Health: A new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. Plos Pathog 18, doi:ARTN e1010537

5. 10. 1371/journal.ppat.1010537 (2022). 10 Bremer, S. & Glavovic, B. Exploring the science-policy interface for Integrated Coastal Management in New Zealand. Ocean Coast Manage 84, 107–118, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.008 (2013).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3