Psychometric properties of the Feeling of Unsafety Scale – Arabic (FUSA) in general population adults.

Author:

Obeid Sahar1,Bitar Zeinab2,Malaeb Diana3,Sakr Fouad4,Dabbous Mariam4,Hallit Souheil5,Fekih-Romdhane Feten6

Affiliation:

1. Lebanese American University

2. University of Rennes

3. Gulf Medical University

4. Lebanese International University

5. Holy Spirit University of Kaslik

6. Hôpital Razi de La Manouba

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Feelings of unsafety, including fear of crime, uncertainty, or insecurity, can negatively impact individuals by reducing psychological well-being and worsening health. Validating a simple and cost-effective tool to assess the general feeling of unsafety in the Arabic-speaking population, primarily residing in the Middle-East and North-Africa (MENA) region, where safety can be a major concern, would be highly beneficial. The study aimed to translate the Feeling of Unsafety Scale into Arabic (FUSA) and evaluate its psychometric properties, including internal reliability, sex invariance, composite reliability, and correlation with a measure of intolerance of uncertainty. Methods: A total of 484 Arabic-speaking adults were recruited between March and April 2024. A self-administered anonymous survey was distributed through social media using a Google Forms link. We used FACTOR software to conduct the exploratory factor analysis of the FUSA scale. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis of the unidimensional model was poor; the exploratory factor analysis conducted on the first split subsample showed a two-factor solution, with the CFA conducted on the second split subsample showing good fit. The latter model fit indices improved even more after adding a correlation between items 2-5 due to high modification indices. the reliability of the scale was excellent as shown by the McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha values for the total score (ω = 0.89 and α = 0.90), Factor 1 = Feeling of outdoor unsafety (ω = 0.91 and α = 0.91) and Factor 2 = Feeling of indoor unsafety (ω = 0.83 and α = 0.83). Invariance was established between males and females. Good concurrent validity was attested by positive correlations between FUSA scores and intolerance of uncertainty dimensions. Conclusion: The FUSA is found to be reliable, valid, and cost-effective for measuring the general feeling of unsafety in the general population. To evaluate its practical effectiveness and further enhance data on its construct validity, future studies should assess the scale in diverse contexts and among specific populations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference81 articles.

1. Violence, peace, and peace research;Galtung J;J Peace Res,1969

2. A theory of human motivation;Maslow AH;Psychol Rev,1943

3. The better angels of our nature: A history of violence and humanity;Pinker S;(No Title),2012

4. The role of individual and collective mindfulness in promoting occupational safety in health care;Dierynck B;Med care Res Rev

5. Leading and lagging indicators of occupational health and safety: The moderating role of safety leadership;Sheehan C;Accid Anal Prev,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3