Affiliation:
1. Kennesaw State University
2. University of Nebraska at Omaha
Abstract
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) will most likely be an integral part of any practical quantum network setup in the future. However, not all QKD protocols can be used in today's networks because of the lack of single photon emitters and noisy intermediate quantum hardware. Attenuated photon transmission typically used to simulate single photon emitters severely limits the achievable transmission distances and the integration of QKD into existing classical networks that use tens of thousands of photons per bit of transmission. Furthermore, it has been found that different protocols perform differently in different network topologies. In order to remove the reliance of QKD on single photon emitters and increase transmission distances, it is worthwhile exploring QKD protocols that do not rely on single-photon transmissions for security, such as the 3-stage QKD protocol; the 3-stage protocol can tolerate multiple photons in each burst without leakage of information. This paper compares and contrasts the 3-stage QKD protocol and its efficiency in different network topologies and conditions. Further, we establish a mathematical relationship between achievable key rates for increasing transmission distances in various topologies. Our results provide insight to a network engineer in designing QKD networks of the future.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Thapliyal, Kishore and Pathak, Anirban (2018) Kak's three-stage protocol of secure quantum communication revisited: hitherto unknown strengths and weaknesses of the protocol. Quantum Information Processing 17(9): 229 1573-1332, 26, Jul
2. Kak, Subhash (2006) A Three-Stage Quantum Cryptography Protocol. Foundations of Physics Letters 19(3): 293-296 1572-9524, 01, Jun
3. Akshata Shenoy-Hejamadi and Anirban Pathak and Srikanth Radhakrishna (2017) Quantum Cryptography: Key Distribution and Beyond. Quanta 6(1): 1--47 1314-7374,
4. Sajeed, Shihan and Chaiwongkhot, Poompong and Huang, Anqi and Qin, Hao and Egorov, Vladimir and Kozubov, Anton and Gaidash, Andrei and Chistiakov, Vladimir and Vasiliev, Artur and Gleim, Artur and Makarov, Vadim (2021) An approach for security evaluation and certification of a complete quantum communication system. Scientific Reports 11(1): 5110 2045-2322, 03, Mar
5. Joseph Burr and Abhishek Parakh and Mahadevan Subramaniam (2022) {Evaluating different topologies for multi-photon quantum key distribution}. SPIE, Orlando, Florida, United States, 1209309, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Eric Donkor and Michael Hayduk and Michael R. Frey and Samuel J. Lomonaco Jr. and John M. Myers, Quantum Information Science, Sensing, and Computation XIV, 12093