Evaluation of different methods in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis infection

Author:

Li Zhaoxin1,Wang Jin1,Xiu Xin1,Shi Zhenpeng1,Zhang Qiang2,Chen Deqiang1

Affiliation:

1. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

2. Shandong Public Health Clinical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background and purposes:Tuberculosis (TB) is the most lethal infectious disease worldwide. About 24.6% of tuberculosis cases are extrapulmonary TB which commonly affects spine. Spinal tuberculosis (STB) is difficult to diagnose. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MGIT-960 culture, T-SPOT.TB, Xpert MTB/RIF, and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in detecting STB. Methods: 126 patients presumed to have STB were tested by 4 methods. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated considering the clinical diagnosis as the reference. Results: 126 patients were enrolled in this study, 41 with STB and 85 with non-STB infection. In the STB group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MGIT-960 culture were 29.3% (12/41), 100% (85/85), 100% (12/12), and 74.6% (85/114).The sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was 92.7% (38/41), and the specificity, PPV and NPV were 82.4% (70/85), 58.5% (31/53) and 95.9% (70/73). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Xpert MTB/RIF were 53.7% (22/41), 100% (85/85), 100% (22/22) and 81.7% (85/104). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mNGS were 39.0% (16/41), 98.8% (84/85), 94.1% (16/17) and 77.1% (84/109).The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the mNGS+Xpert MTB/RIF group were 73.2% (30/41), 100% (85/85), 96.8% (30/31) and 72.0% (85/118). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the mNGS+T-spot group were 97.6% (40/41), 100% (85/85), 67.9% (38/56) and 75.9% (85/113).The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the T-spot+Xpert MTB/RIF group were 95.1% (39/41), 100% (85/85), 72.2% (39/54) and 81.0% (85/105). Conclusions: Among the 4 detection methods, T-SPOT.TB is the most effective technique for diagnosing STB, but Xpert MTB/RIF is more reliable and can detect RIF resistance. mNGS can be used to identify pathogens in patients with spinal infections, and pathogens identified by mNGS appear to be more meaningful in guiding clinical management in patients in the non-STB group. The combination of Xpert MTB/RIF and mNGS can improve the early diagnosis rate and detection of drug resistance of STB, reduce the diagnosis cycle, and provide early targeted anti-tuberculosis treatment.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Global tuberculosis report. (2022). World Health Organization. https://www.doc88.com/p-70087883366543.html[Accessed March 17, 202[Accessed March 17, 2023].]

2. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in China: a national survey;Li T;Int J Infect Dis,2023

3. Spinal tuberculosis: a review;Garg RK;J Spinal Cord Med,2011

4. Increase in extrapulmonary tuberculosis in England and Wales 1999–2006;Kruijshaar ME;Thorax,2009

5. Jain AK, Kumar J. 2013). Tuberculosis of spine: neurological deficit. Eur Spine J, null(null), 624 – 33. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2335-7.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3