3D printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification

Author:

BOUILLOT Caroline1ORCID,DALIGAULT Sébastien1,BOLBOS Radu1,COSTES Nicolas1,ZIMMER Luc2

Affiliation:

1. CERMEP

2. Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: The low throughout of small animal positron emission tomography (PET) images acquisitions represents a substantial limitation. The aims of this study were (i) to design an low-cost support for whole-body PET scanning of two lying rats, and (ii) to study its impact on brain image quantification. Methods: A dual holder system compatible with the Siemens INVEON PET scanner was conceived and produced using a 3D printer. The developed system allows to overlap the two INVEON beds, 5 cm apart. Two cone masks can deliver gas anesthesia through the scanner’s head side, and the tail veins of both rats are freely accessible on the back side of the scanner, allowing the radiotracer injection before or during the scans. Ear and tooth bars immobilize the rats’ head on a stereotactic position. Six experiments of two cylindrical phantoms per session (50 ml tubes filled with different 18F activity) were scanned solo, on upper or lower bed and duo, on both beds. Four experiments were performed on 8 Sprague Dawley male rats (330 ± 66 g). For each experiment, two rats fasted for 4 hours, received a [18F]FDG dose (34.5 ± 5.5 kBq) and underwent 4 imaging conditions, starting 20 minutes after radiotracer injection: (1) One rat only for a solo test scan (2) repeated for a solo retest, (3) two rats simultaneously for a duo test, (4) repeated for a duo retest. Results: Accuracy of concentration measurement was 5.09% for one phantom in the FOV, and 4.35% for two phantoms measured simultaneously. Ratio concentration between phantoms reached an accuracy of 6.59% for separated measures, and 5.77% for simultaneous measures. In vivo distribution profiles showed no difference between solo and duo uptakes. ROI quantification in the whole brain showed same test-retest variability for solo and duo measurement (both at 3%). The quantified test-retest bias was 8% in solo and 4% in duo, and the ICC were comparable in solo and duo (0.984 versus 0.982). Conclusions: Our results showed that simultaneous scans of two rats in INVEON does not affect quantification. The dual support system will allow us to reduce protocol costs and duration.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3