Faster both in operative time and functional recovery by the extraperitoneal daVinci SP- based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis compared to transperitoneal multiport counterpart

Author:

Ko Young Hwii1,Jang Jae Youn1,Kim Yeong Uk1,Kim Sang Won1

Affiliation:

1. Yeungnam University

Abstract

Abstract

We aim to investigate the peri-operative outcomes after extraperitoneal single-port based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eSP-RARP) utilizing the da Vinci SP system compared to conventional transperitoneal multi-port counterparts (tMP-RARP), in an era when pelvic lymph node dissection (PNLD) was omitted for the node-negative case. With exclusion criteria of volume + 50g, suspicious rectal invasion, and node-positive disease given relatively weak grasping power and limited range of motion from the current SP system, 50 consecutive patients (Since December 2021) with localized prostate cancer underwent eSP-RARP by a single urologist maintaining identical surgical technique for 100 consecutive tMP-RARP cases (Since December 2020). Given initial selection criteria, each group was matched to a 1:1 ratio based on the risk-stratification parameters and the prostate volume. The operative time, which was maintained in each group during the study period, was significantly faster in eSP-RARP groups than in tMP-RARP (149.2 vs. 163.2 minutes, p = .025), while the weight of the removed specimen (27.1 vs. 29.0 g, p = .420) and margin positivity (14.7% vs. 11.7% in pT2, p = .812) were similar. The gas-out (1.5 vs. 1.88 days, p = .003) and solid diet dates (2.26 vs. 3.22 days, p < .001) were faster in the eSP-RARP group. The single-pad continence dates (30.5 vs. 51.9 days, p = .145) and zero-pad continence dates (105.5 vs. 146.2 days, p = .210) were identical. 90-day single-pad continence rate was 92% vs. 82% (p = .142, 52% vs. 56% in zero-pad continence). Based on these, daVinci SP-based RARP restored bowel function faster with shorter operative time through an extraperitoneal approach than the conventional transperitoneal multi-port counterpart while maintaining similar incontinence outcomes in cases without a routine PNLD.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3