Barriers and facilitators for universal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus screening in a low resource setting: A cross-sectional study in Sri Lanka

Author:

godevithana janaka1,Wijesinghe Champa Jayalakshmie1

Affiliation:

1. University of Ruhuna

Abstract

Abstract

Background Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and increased risk of developing diabetes in later life. Sri Lanka adopted universal GDM screening at two time points in pregnancy (before 12 weeks and between 24 to 28 weeks) in 2014 and its utilization has not been assessed. This study assessed the utilization of GDM screening services and associated factors among antenatal mothers in Southern Sri Lanka. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in a consecutive sample of 420 postpartum mothers who delivered at three major hospitals in Sri Lanka. Data were collected on socio-demographics, pregnancy, availability and utilization of screening services and logistics using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a data record sheet. Data was analysed using SPSS software. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between variables. Results The coverage of first and second screening tests were 91.4% and 94.5% and timeliness was 72.4% and 59.5%, respectively. The median period of amenorrhoea at the first and second screening were 10.0 (inter-quartile range-2.5) weeks and 28.0 (inter-quartile range-1.5) weeks. A higher utilization was associated with higher income (OR = 3.4, 95% CI – 1.1–10.5) and planned pregnancy (OR = 4.9, 95% CI – 2.2–10.7) for the first screening test. Primiparity (OR = 0.3, 95% CI – 0.1–0.9) and proximity of the nearest laboratory (OR = 3.5, 95% CI – 1.0–12.0) were positively associated with the second screening test. The timeliness of both screening tests was associated with planned pregnancy (OR = 2.1, 95% CI – 1.1-4.0 and OR = 2.3, 95% CI – 1.1–4.5) and being non-employed during the pregnancy (OR = 2.5, 95% CI – 1.4–4.3 and OR = 2.3, 95% CI – 1.3–4.1). Conclusions A high utilization of GDM screening was observed. Timeliness should be ensured through improved availability and accessibility of screening facilities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus;American Diabetes Association;Diabetes Care,2013

2. The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Associations With Neonatal Anthropometrics. Diabetes. 2009;58(February):453–9.

3. Ferrara A. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: A public health perspective. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(SUPPL. 2).

4. Vince K, Perković P, Matijević R. What is known and what remains unresolved regarding gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). J Perinat Med [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Oct 7];48(8):757–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32827397/

5. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy;Guariguata L;Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3