Comparison of three different anastomotic methods of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition using an obese rodent model

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The long-term effects and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass have not been confirmed. One anastomosis procedure carries the risk of bile reflux, and Braun anastomosis can reduce bile reflux. This study was designed to compare the influences of bile reflux and histological changes in the esogastric sections of rats. Methods: Obese Sprague-Dawley rats underwent sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (RYTB) (n=12), SASI (n=12), SASI bypass with Braun anastomosis (BTB) (n=12), esojejunostomy (EJ) (n=12), and SHAM (n=8) surgery. During the 12-week follow-up period, weight changes, glucose improvement, and changes in serum nutrition were evaluated. Histological expression and bile acid concentration in the rats in all groups were also evaluated. Results: No significant differences in weight loss and glucose improvements were observed in the RYTB, SASI, and BTB groups. The RYTB and BTB groups had significantly lower bile acid concentration and albumin levels than the SASI group. In addition, mucosal height in the RYTB and BTB groups was significantly lower than in the SASI group. Conclusion: Braun anastomosis had a significant effect on anti-reflux. BTB may be a superior primary procedure due to its potential for parallel bariatric and metabolic improvements, effective anti-reflux effects, simplified operations, and avoidance of severe malnutrition. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.