Investigation of scatter radiation intensities in the cardiac catheter laboratory: novel versus traditional shielding solutions

Author:

Mirjalili Negar1ORCID,Tse Jason1,Crowhurst James A2,Dautov Rustem2

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Technology Services

2. The Prince Charles Hospital

Abstract

Abstract A manufacturer has released a novel shielding solution (NSS): Rampart M1128 and claimed that the lead aprons can be removed. This study investigates the scatter intensities with the NSS or the traditional shielding solutions (TSS) including the ceiling-suspended screen and the tableside lead drape. Isodose maps were generated by two series of measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom using NSS and TSS. Three survey meters were positioned at different heights to measure the scatter intensities at the eye, chest, and pelvic levels. Additional measurements were made at the primary and secondary operators’ locations to evaluate the scatter intensities with different clinical projections. For the main operators, the isodose maps showed that NSS could result in a scatter dose that was between 80% and 95% lower than those of TSS at the eye and chest levels. The corresponding result at the pelvic level could go down to around 50%. These reductions should be compared to the additional protection by conventional lead protections: up to 80% reduction from lead eyeglasses and up to 95% from lead aprons. At LAO30 and between CRA30 and CAU30, NSS led to lower scatter doses ranging from 76% to 96% than those of TSS to both operators at the eye and chest levels. The range reduced to 25% and 60% at the pelvic level. The protection of NSS is comparable with that of TSS alongside conventional lead protections at the eye but not at the chest and the pelvic levels under the setup of CA.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference14 articles.

1. SCAI Multi-Society Position Statement on Occupational Health Hazards of the Catheterization Laboratory: Shifting the Paradigm for Healthcare Workers' Protection;Klein LW;J Am Coll Cardiol,2020

2. Moore B, VanSonnenberg E, Casola G et al Relatsh between back pain lead apron use Radiol 1992(0361-803X (Print)).

3. Ross AM, Segal J, Borenstein D et al Preval spinal disc disease among interventional cardiologists 1997(0002-9149 (Print)).

4. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice;Goldstein JA;Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2004

5. Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures;Savage C;Open J Radiol,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3