“And who would question God?”: Patient engagement and healthcare decision-making of South-Asian older adults in the Canadian healthcare system

Author:

Chowdhury Diya1,Tong Catherine2,Neiterman Elena1,Lopez Kimberly1,Stolee Paul1

Affiliation:

1. University of Waterloo

2. Research Institute of Aging

Abstract

Abstract With the increase in ethnocultural diversity in the Canadian demographic landscape, it is imperative for healthcare providers and policy makers to understand the needs and preferences of racialized immigrant older adults. Previous research has shown that to increase patient satisfaction with care and lower treatment costs it is important to effectively involve patients in their care. However, we currently lack the understanding of how racialized immigrant older adults want to engage as patients, the factors that influence their involvement in their own care, and who they want involved in the decisions surrounding their care. To address this gap in the literature specifically for the South Asian community, one of Canada’s largest and fastest growing populations, our study aimed to understand South Asian older adults’ experiences with and approaches to patient engagement and shared decision-making. We conducted in-depth individual and dyadic interviews (n=28) in six languages, utilizing a multilingual cross-cultural qualitative approach. Our findings highlight the nuances of language and how miscommunication can arise even when patients and providers are conversing in the same language. Our study also found that patient engagement and shared decision-making, including the desire for family involvement, is heavily influenced by both culture and gender. Additionally, perceptions of patients regarding the status of physicians can have a notable influence on patient engagement, leading to an increased tendency for patients to agree with the physicians’ approach to care. These findings suggest that effective engagement between providers and patients require a tailored approach that extends beyond white-centric approaches to decision-making and communication.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference171 articles.

1. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M et al. Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies. Health Aff [Internet]. 2013;32:223–231. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.

2. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2012;366:780–781. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375967.

3. Armstrong MJ, Shulman LM, Vandigo J et al. Patient engagement and shared decision-making. Neurol Clin Pract [Internet]. 2016;6:190–197. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828680/.

4. Galletta M, Piazza MF, Meloni SL et al. Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently? Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022;19:14229. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656720/.

5. Kambhampati S, Ashvetiya T, Stone NJ et al. Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology. Curr Cardiol Rep [Internet]. 2016;18:49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098670.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3