Mental health practitioners’ perceptions and adoption intentions of AI-enabled technologies: an international mixed-methods study

Author:

Cecil Julia1,Kleine Anne-Kathrin1,Lermer Eva1,Gaube Susanne2

Affiliation:

1. LMU Munich

2. University College London, UCL East – Marshgate

Abstract

Abstract

Background: As mental health disorders continue to surge, exceeding the capacity of available therapeutic resources, the emergence of technologies enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions for supporting and delivering patient care. However, there is limited research on mental health practitioners’ understanding, familiarity, and adoption intentions regarding these AI technologies. We, therefore, examined to what extent practitioners’ characteristics are associated with their learning and use intentions of AI technologies in four application domains (diagnostics, treatment, feedback, and practice management). These characteristics include medical AI readiness with its subdimensions, AI anxiety with its subdimensions, technology self-efficacy, affinity for technology interaction, and professional identification. Methods: Mixed-methods data from N = 392 German and US practitioners, encompassing psychotherapists (in training), psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists, was analyzed. A deductive thematic approach was employed to evaluate mental health practitioners’ understanding and familiarity with AI technologies. Additionally, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationship between practitioners’ characteristics and their adoption intentions for different technologies. Results: Qualitative analysis unveiled a substantial gap in familiarity with AI applications in mental healthcare among practitioners. While some practitioner characteristics were only associated with specific AI application areas (e.g., cognitive readiness with learning intentions for feedback tools), we found that learning intention, ethical knowledge, and affinity for technology interaction were relevant across all four application areas, making them key drivers for the adoption of AI technologies in mental healthcare. Conclusion: In conclusion, this pre-registered study underscores the importance of recognizing the interplay between diverse factors for training opportunities and consequently, a streamlined implementation of AI-enabled technologies in mental healthcare.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference104 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World Mental Health Report.: Transforming mental health for all [Internet]. www.who.int. World Health Organization. 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338.

2. Minerva F, Giubilini A, Is. AI the Future of Mental Healthcare? Topoi [Internet]. 2023 May 31 [cited 2023 Jun 15]; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09932-3.

3. AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians;Kellogg KC;Front Psychiatry,2022

4. Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: qualitative findings from a global physician survey;Blease C;Digit Health,2020

5. Advancing mental health care with AI-enabled precision psychiatry tools: A patent review;Kleine AK;Comput Hum Behav Rep,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3