Short-term outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Sigmoidectomy using the Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System: A Comparison with Laparoscopic Surgery Using Propensity Score Matching

Author:

Akuta Sohei1,Hirano Yasumitsu1,Ishiyama Yasuhiro1,Yamato Misuzu1,Yoshizawa Masatoshi1,Tanaka Hiroto1,Fujii Takatsugu1,Okazaki Naoto1,Ishii Toshimasa1,Deguchi Katsuya1,Hiranuma Chikashi1,Aikawa Masayasu1,Sato Hiroshi1,Sakuramoto Shinichi1,Okamoto Kojun1,Kinugasa Yusuke1,Koyam Isamu1

Affiliation:

1. Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is a common and deadly form of cancer. Sigmoid colon cancer is the most prevalent type of colon cancer. Robotic-assisted surgical systems, like the Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System, have attracted much attention in recent years. This study aimed to examine the safety of Senhance by comparing Senhance-assisted surgery with conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Methods This retrospective single-center study analyzed data from patients undergoing sigmoidectomies between March 2020 and 2023. Propensity score matching was employed to create comparable groups. Patient characteristics, short-term surgical outcomes, and pathological data were assessed. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system. Results Prior to propensity score matching, there were differences between groups regarding the cancer stage. After matching, two groups comprising 17 patients each were comparable across various factors. The operative time was significantly longer in the Senhance-assisted group (235 min vs. 165 min, p = 0.002), underscoring the importance of optimizing surgical techniques. However, no significant differences were observed in blood loss, complications, or pathological characteristics between the groups. Conclusions Robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy using Senhance appears to be as safe as conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference27 articles.

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021 May) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PMID: 33538338

2. Fang QW, Gong XH, Xiao WJ, Jin BH, Yu X, Cui P, Han RB, Kong DC, Wu HY, Pan H (2020 Dec 10) [Epidemiological characteristics and measures of prevention and control of imported COVID-19 cases in early phase in Shanghai]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 41:2034–2039. Chinese. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200413-00566, PMID: 33378813

3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Ota D (2004 May 13) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032651, PMID: 15141043

4. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005 May 14–20) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2, PMID: 15894098

5. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial;Fleshman J;Ann Surg,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3