The effectiveness of interventions used to improve general health check uptake by the older adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Lau Wing Yan1,Lian Jinxiao1,Yap Maurice1

Affiliation:

1. Public Health Research Group, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Abstract

Abstract As the population ages, promoting good health maintenance practices has become an important strategy in many health systems. Regular general health checks detect common diseases and empower older adults to monitor their physical health. Yet the service uptake rate is low. Previous reviews have identified intervention methods to improve the uptake rate, but the overall effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. This review aims to determine the overall effectiveness of the interventions used to improve general health check uptake and identify the behavior change techniques used in these interventions. Literature searches were conducted in four electronic databases in August 2020 and updated in May 2021. Six randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Seven intervention types were identified, including enhanced invitation letters, telephone invitation, question-behavior-effect questionnaire, financial incentive, leaflet, pre-notification, and SMS reminder. Overall, the interventions are effective, with an odds ratio of 1.21, and a 95% confidence interval between 1.09–1.33. Fifteen behavior change techniques were identified using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (v1). The findings suggest that the current interventions implemented in invitation methods are effective in improving the general health check uptake rate, but there are still opportunities to further improve the uptake rate by considering other intervention types. Future studies could consider how other intervention types could be implemented alone or with the enhanced invitation methods to maximize the service uptake rate. The systematic review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42021221041).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. United Nations. World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights. 2019. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 05 Jul 2022.

2. World Health Organization. Integrated care for older people: guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity. 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/258981. Accessed 05 Jul 2022.

3. National Health Service. What is an NHS Health Check? 2019. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/nhs-health-check/what-is-an-nhs-health-check-new/. Accessed 07 Jun 2020.

4. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the 45–49 year old health check versus usual care in Australian general practice: a modelling study;Si S;PLoS ONE,2018

5. The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: a microsimulation study;Mytton OT;PLoS Med,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3