Post-discharge follow-up of congenital duodenal obstruction patients: A systematic review

Author:

Min Suyin A. Lum1,Imam Malaz1,Zrinyi Anna1,Shawyer Anna C.1,Keijzer Richard1

Affiliation:

1. University of Manitoba, Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE Long-term follow-up of congenital duodenal obstruction patients often falls on care providers with little experience of this condition. We performed a systematic review of the long-term outcomes of duodenal obstruction and provide a summary of sequelae care providers should anticipate. METHODS In 2022, after registering with PROSPERA, Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PSYCHINFO, CNAHL and SCOPUS databases were searched using the title keyword ‘intestinal atresia’. Abstracts were filtered for inclusion if they included the duodenum. Papers of filtered abstracts were included if they reported post-discharge outcomes. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to grade the papers. RESULTS Of the 1068 abstracts were screened, 32 papers were reviewed. Eleven studies were included. Thirty additional papers were included after reviewing references, for a total of 41 papers. The average MINORS was 7/16. CONCLUSIONS There is good evidence that children with congenital duodenal obstruction do well in terms of survival, growth and general well-being. Associated cardiac, musculoskeletal and renal anomalies should be ruled-out. Care providers should be aware of anastomotic dysfunction, blind loop syndrome, bowel obstruction and reflux. Reflux may be asymptomatic. Laparoscopic repair does not change long-term outcomes, and associated Trisomy 21 worsens neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference86 articles.

1. Nichol, P.F. and A. Reichstein, Intestinal Atresias, in Fundamentals of Pediatric Surgery. 2011. p. 359–363.

2. Open vs laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstructions: a concurrent series;Spilde TL;J Pediatr Surg,2008

3. Assessment and significance of long-term outcomes in pediatric surgery;IJsselstijn H;Semin Pediatr Surg,2017

4. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews;Ouzzani M;Syst Rev,2016

5. Scherer, R.W. and I.J. Saldanha, How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev, 2019. 8(1): p. 264.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3