Global, Regional, and National Quality of Care Index of Cervical and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019

Author:

Azangou-Khyavy Mohammadreza1,Ghasemi Erfan2,Rezaei Negar2,Khanali Javad1,Kolahi Ali-Asghar1,Malekpour Mohammad-Reza2,Heidari‐Foroozan Mahsa2,Nasserinejad Maryam2,Mohammadi Esmaeil2,Abbasi-Kangevari Mohsen2,Ghamari Seyyed-Hadi2,Ebrahimi Narges2,Koolaji Sogol2,Khosravifar Mina2,Fateh Sahar Mohammadi2,Larijani Bagher2,Farzadfar Farshad2

Affiliation:

1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

2. Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background and objective: Cervical cancer is the most preventable and ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer. However, in the world, there are disparities in health care performances resulting in differences in the burden of these cancers. The objective of this study was to compare the health-system quality of care and inequities for these cancers using the Quality of Care Index (QCI). Material and methods: the 1990-2019 data of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) was analyzed to extract rates of incidence, prevalence, mortality, DALY, YLL, and YLD of cervical and ovarian cancer. Four indices were developed as proxy for the quality of care using abovementioned rates. Thereafter, a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was applied to construct the Quality of Care Index (QCI) as a summary measure of the developed indices. Results: The incidence of cervical cancer decreased from 1990 to 2019, whereas the incidence of ovarian cancer increased between these years. However, the mortality rate of both cancers decreased in this interval. The global age-standardized QCI for cervical cancer and ovarian cancer were 43.1 and 48.5 in 1990 and increased to 58.5 and 58.4 in 2019, respectively. QCI for cervical cancer and ovarian cancer generally decreased by aging, and different age groups had inequitable QCIs. Higher income countries generally had higher QCIs for both cancers, but exceptions were also observed. Conclusions: disparities in the quality of care of cervical and ovarian cancer at various locations, among different SDI levels, and age groups were observed. Acknowledging these disparities highlights the imperative to improve health care systems to reach the aim of equity in the quality of health care for these cancers.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference59 articles.

1. Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdel-Rahman O et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-Adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749–68.

2. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017;James SL;The Lancet

3. Collins Y, Holcomb K, Chapman-Davis E, Khabele D, Farley JH. Gynecologic cancer disparities: A report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Gynecologic Oncology. Volume 133. Academic Press Inc.; 2014. pp. 353–61.

4. Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2018 Jun 1;127(3):404–16.

5. Aminorroaya A, Fattahi N, Azadnajafabad S, Mohammadi E, Jamshidi K, Rouhifard Khalilabad M et al. Burden of non-communicable diseases in Iran: past, present, and future. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2020 Oct 27;1–7.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3