Affiliation:
1. Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences
2. Sichuan University
Abstract
Abstract
The list of questionable journals serves to stratify academic journals, distinguishing between good and bad journals, thereby providing a basis for academic information filtering and research evaluation. The formulation of such lists has been a topic of controversy in the literature, with limited attention paid to whether the criteria used to stratify journals in these lists can be trusted. In this study, we take the example of the warning journal list published by the National Science Library of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and categorize the journals based on their warning levels and warning years. Then, we compare them to determine if there are differences in key academic indicators, thereby analyzing whether the journal lists effectively identify academic journals with quality risks. Our study found that the patterns of differences in key academic indicators among different journal stratums were not consistent, and the same inconsistency was observed during the mobility between stratums. Furthermore, citation metrics such as Journal Impact Factor and Journal Citation Indicator may not have been considered as criteria for stratifying journals in the warning journal list, but this lack of detailed explanation from the creators. This indicates that the list of questionable journals needs to be more scientifically evaluated, and there is a greater need for sharing detailed criteria and data. Our study also provides recommendations for institutions in the future when formulating lists of questionable journals.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. “The Journal List and Its Use: Motivation, Perceptions, and Reality;Adams Dennis;European Journal of Information Systems,2008
2. “Gauging the Quality of Behavioral Science Journals by Using Bibliometric Indicators;Ansari Khadeeja MN;COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management,2020
3. “A Walk on the Wild Side: ‘Predatory’ Journals and Information Asymmetries in Scientific Evaluations;Bagues Manuel;Research Policy,2019
4. “Prizes, Publications, and Transnational Communication at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in the Nineteenth Century;Beckman Jenny;Nuncius: Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science,2019
5. Impact Factors, Citation Distributions and Journal Stratification;Blanford Christopher F;Journal of Materials Science,2016