Honey bees rob flowers after observing conspecifics and carpenter bees

Author:

Kapdi Khatija1,De Jager Marinus Louis2ORCID,Allsopp Mike3,Minnaar Corneile1,Anderson Bruce1

Affiliation:

1. Stellenbosch University

2. La Trobe University - Melbourne Campus: La Trobe University

3. ARC Plant Protection Research Institute

Abstract

Abstract Individuals may add to their behavioural repertoire by observing conspecifics, and possibly heterospecifics. Here we test Darwin’s intriguing hypothesis that honey bees rob nectar from flowers after observing the behaviour of other bees. We trained naïve honey bees to forage for sucrose by entering the flower-tube opening of custom designed 3D-printed model flowers before exposing individual bees to experimental flowers. In these flowers, nectar could only be accessed via a small hole at the base of the corolla tube, thereby simulating secondary nectar-robbing. Bees had to change their foraging behaviour from foraging via the mouth of the flower to foraging from the tube-base to rob. Different demonstrators were used to indicate the presence of a robbing hole. To explore the efficiency of information transfer from different demonstrators, we moved dead conspecific and heterospecific (carpenter bees and crickets) demonstrators towards this small hole to imitate nectar robbing. Differences in the ability and speed of honey bees to imitate robbing behaviour were recorded for each demonstrator treatment. Naïve honey bees switched to robbing behaviour more frequently when observing honey bee and carpenter bee demonstrators than when observing cricket demonstrators or controls that lacked a demonstrator. However, honey bees switched to robbing behaviour significantly faster after observing conspecifics than after observing any other demonstrators. This study demonstrates that honey bees can gather information from conspecifics and even heterospecifics while foraging, which can influence foraging behaviour such as flower robbing. Utilizing foraging cues from other individuals may lead to conspecific and heterospecific learning. “I can hardly doubt they [honeybees] were profiting by the workmanship and the example of the humble-bees: should this be verified, it will, I think, be a very instructive case of acquired knowledge in insects.” Darwin 1841

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Associative mechanisms allow for social learning and cultural transmission of string pulling in an insect;Alem S;PLoS Biol,2016

2. Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods;Anderson DR;J Wildl Manag,2002

3. Mechanisms of social learning across species boundaries;Avargues-Weber A;J Zool,2013

4. Barton K (2017) MuMIn:Multi-ModelInference.Rpackageversion1.40.0

5. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4;Bates D;J Stat Softw,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3