Effects of a novel differential diagnosis aid for managing patients with unexplained fatigue in the primary care setting. A prospective randomized, controlled and multicentre pilot study in primary care

Author:

Känel Roland1,Neuner-Jehle Stefan2,Kressig Reto W.3,Guessous Idris4,Krayenbühl Pierre Alexandre5,Zimmerli Lukas6,Angelilo-Scherer Anne7,Keller Thomas8,Elzner Caroline8,Pauls Karl9,Morin Neige10,Battegay Edouard11

Affiliation:

1. University of Zurich

2. University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich

3. University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter & University of Basel

4. Geneva University Hospitals

5. Hausarztpraxis Brauereistrasse, Uster, Switzerland

6. Cantonal Hospital Olten, Solothurner Spitäler AG

7. University Insel Hospital, Basel University

8. ACOMED Statistik

9. ZEG

10. CSL Vifor

11. University of Zurich, University Hospital Basel (Clinic for Psychosomatic Diseases), Merian Iselin Klinik

Abstract

Abstract Objective Unexplained fatigue is a common reason for encounter in the primary care setting, with currently no structured tool available to support diagnosis. This study evaluated the effects of the novel Fatigue Differential Diagnostic Aid (FDDA) in clinical practice. Design This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre study comparing use of the FDDA vs usual care in patients with unexplained fatigue as the main reason for encounter. Setting and Participants The study included 93 patients seen in the primary care setting (FDDA n=40, usual care n=53) in Switzerland. Outcomes Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), patient satisfaction with treatment and fatigue improvement, treatment patterns, number of examinations, number of visits. Results There was no statistically significant group difference for the primary endpoint of PGIC. However, five predefined endpoints met statistical significance: (1) More patients were very satisfied with treatment management in the FDDA group at both 1 month (FDDA 56.8% vs usual care 25.6%, p=0.004) and 3 months (FDDA 64.9% vs usual care 31%, p=0.003); (2) patients underwent more examinations at baseline in the FDDA group (median 11.0 for FDDA vs 7.0 for usual care, p=0.002); (3) The FDDA group received a wider range of, and more treatments at 1 month, but less iron replacement therapy (p=0.0233); the FDDA was also associated with (4) a higher total number of visits (median 4.0 vs 3.0, p <0.001), and (5) more patients reporting reduced fatigue after 3 or 6 months (FDDA 97.4% vs usual care 78.4%, p=0.011). Conclusions The FDDA has the potential to improve the management of fatigue. The findings of this study may be relevant to clinical practice because physicians using the FDDA investigated the causes of fatigue more extensively, and more patients reported reduced fatigue. Further studies on diagnostic tools for unexplained fatigue are warranted.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3