A Qualitative Analysis of Algorithm-based Decision Support Usability Testing for Symptom Management Across the Trajectory of Cancer Care: One Size Does Not Fit All

Abstract

Abstract Background Adults with cancer experience symptoms that change across the disease trajectory. Due to the distress and cost associated with uncontrolled symptoms, improving symptom management is an important component of quality cancer care. Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising strategy to integrate clinical practice guideline (CPG)-based symptom management recommendations at the point of care. Methods The objectives of this project were to develop and evaluate the usability of two symptom management algorithms (constipation and fatigue) across the trajectory of cancer care in patients with active disease treated in comprehensive or community cancer care to surveillance of cancer survivors in primary care practice settings. A modified ADAPTE process was used to develop algorithms based on national CPGs. Usability testing involved semi-structured interviews with clinicians from varied care settings, including comprehensive and community cancer centers, and primary care. The transcripts were analyzed with MAXQDA using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis method. A cross tabs analysis was also performed to assess the prevalence of themes and subthemes by cancer care setting. Results A total of 17 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were interviewed for usability testing. Three main themes emerged: 1) Algorithms as useful, 2) Symptom management differences, and 3) Different target end-users. The cross-tabs analysis demonstrated differences among care trajectories and settings that originated in the Symptom management differences theme. The sub-themes of “Differences between diseases” and “Differences between care trajectories” originated from participants working in comprehensive cancer center, which tend to be disease-specific locations for patients on active treatment. Meanwhile, participants from primary care identified the sub-theme of “Differences in settings,” indicating that symptom management strategies are setting specific. Conclusions While CDS can help promote evidence-based symptom management, systems providing care recommendations need to be specifically developed to fit patient characteristics and context. Findings suggest that one set of algorithms will not be applicable throughout the entire cancer trajectory. Unique CDS for symptom management will be needed for patients who are cancer survivors being followed in primary care settings.