Improvement of Image Quality in Low-Count Bone Scintigraphy Using Deep Learning

Author:

Murata Taisuke1,Onoguchi Masahisa2ORCID,Hashimoto Takuma1,Shibutani Takayuki3,Iimori Takashi1,Sawada Koichi1,Umezawa Tetsuro1,Masuda Yoshitada1,Uno Takashi4

Affiliation:

1. Chiba University Hospital

2. Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University

3. Kanazawa University

4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University

Abstract

Abstract Objective To improve image quality for low-count bone scintigraphy whole-body images using deep learning and evaluate their applicability in clinical practice.Methods Five hundred fifty patients were included in the study. Low-count Original images (75%, 50%, 25%, 10%, and 5% counts) were generated from Reference images (100% counts) using Poisson resampling. Patients were randomly divided into training (500) and evaluation (50) groups. Output (DL-filtered) images were obtained after training with U-Net using Reference images as teacher data. Gaussian-filtered images were generated for comparison. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) to the Reference image were calculated to determine image quality. Artificial neural network (ANN) value, bone scan index (BSI), and number of hotspots (Hs) were computed using BONENAVI analysis for patients with and without bone metastases, to assess diagnostic performance. Accuracy of bone metastasis detection and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Original, Gaussian-filtered, and DL-filtered images were compared with Reference images.Results PSNR and SSIM for DL-filtered images were highest in all count percentages. BONENAVI analysis values for DL-filtered images did not differ significantly regardless of the presence or absence of bone metastases. BONENAVI analysis values for Original and Gaussian-filtered images differed significantly at < 25% counts in patients without bone metastases. In patients with bone metastases, BSI and Hs for Original and Gaussian-filtered images differed significantly at < 10% counts, whereas ANN values did not. Accuracy of bone metastasis detection was highest for DL-filtered images in all count percentages; AUC did not differ significantly. Accuracy of Original and Gaussian-filtered images worsened with decreasing count percentage; AUC differed significantly for Original images at < 50% counts and for Gaussian-filtered images at < 25% counts.Conclusions Our deep learning model improved image quality and bone metastasis detection accuracy for low-count bone scintigraphy whole-body images, suggesting its applicability in clinical practice.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Bone Metastases: An Overview;Macedo F;Oncol Rev,2017

2. Current role of bone scan with phosphonates in the follow-up of breast cancer;Maffioli L;Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2004

3. Nuclear medicine imaging of posttraumatic osteomyelitis;Govaert GAM;Eur J Trauma and Emerg Surg,2016

4. Bone scan in metabolic bone diseases;Abdelrazek S;Rev Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur,2012

5. SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Suspected Skeletal Pathology;Koppula BR;Tomography,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3