Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP): A brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients

Author:

Rojas-Concha Leslye1,Arrarras Juan Ignacio2,Conroy Thierry3,Chalk Tara4,Guberti Monica5,Holzner Bernhard6,Husson Olga7,Kuliś Dagmara8,Shamieh Omar9,Piccinin Claire8,Puga María José10,Rohde Gudrun11,Groenvold Mogens1

Affiliation:

1. Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen

2. Servicio Navarro de Salud, Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA)

3. Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy

4. Supportive Oncology Research Team, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust

5. Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale –IRCCS di Reggio Emilia

6. Medical University of Innsbruck

7. Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

8. EORTC

9. King Hussein Cancer Center

10. Hospital Base Valdivia

11. Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)’ instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. Methods We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP. Results From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment. Conclusions The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3