Decision-Making Process about Prenatal Genetic Screening: How deeply do Moms-to-Be Want to Know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?

Author:

Oliveri Serena1,Ongaro Giulia2,Cutica Ilaria2,Menicucci Giulia3,Belperio Debora3,Spinella Francesca3,Pravettoni Gabriella2

Affiliation:

1. IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS

2. University of Milan

3. Eurofins Genoma Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratories

Abstract

Abstract Background. Two procedures are available to obtain prenatal information: invasive diagnostic procedures, and non-invasive diagnostic procedures, such as those that use cell-free fetal DNA. Several psychological factors are involved in the decision to undergo a non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) but little is known about the decision-making strategies involved in choosing a specific level of in-depth NIPT, considering the increased availability and complexity of NIPT options. The main aim of this work is to assess the impact of psychological factors (anxiety about pregnancy, perception of risk in pregnancy, intolerance to uncertainty), and COVID-19 pandemic on the type of NIPT chosen, in terms of the number of conditions that are tested. Methods. A self-administered survey evaluated the decision-making process about NIPT. The final sample comprised 191 women (Mage= 35.53; SD= 4.79) who underwent a NIPT from one private Italian genetic company. Based on the test date, the sample of women was divided between “NIPT before COVID-19” and “NIPT during COVID-19”. Results. Almost all of the participants reported being aware of the existence of different types of NIPT and more than half reported having been informed by their gynecologist. Results showed no significant association between the period in which women underwent NIPT (before COVID-19 or during COVID-19) and the preferences for more expanded screening panel. Furthermore, regarding psychological variables, results showed a significant difference between baby’s risk perception based on the NIPT type groups, revealing that the mums-to-be who underwent the more expanded panel had a significantly higher level of baby’s risk perception than that reported by the mums-to-be who underwent the basic one. There was no statistically significant difference between the other psychological variables and NIPT type. Conclusions. Our findings indicate the paramount role of gynecologist and other health care providers, such as geneticists and psychologists, to support decision-making process in NIPT, in order to overcome people’s deficits in genetic knowledge, promote awareness about their preferences, and control anxiety related to the unborn child. Decision-support strategies are critical during the onset of prenatal care, according to the advances in prenatal genomics and to parent’s needs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference64 articles.

1. Chances and Challenges of New Genetic Screening Technologies (NIPT) in Prenatal Medicine from a Clinical Perspective: A Narrative Review;Bedei I;Genes (Basel),2021

2. Prenatal Genetic Testing: An Investigation of Determining Factors Affecting the Decision-Making Process;Pivetti M;J Genet Couns,2013

3. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Akolekar R;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2015

4. Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review;Mattei V;Heal Psychol Open,2021

5. The limited effect of information on Israeli pregnant women at advanced maternal age who decide to undergo amniocentesis;Grinshpun-Cohen J;Isr J Health Policy Res,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3