An examination of tweets posted before and after enactment of Twitter’s Suicide and Self-Harm Policy: a content analysis study.

Author:

Moghimi Elnaz1,Keller Kevin2,Thampinathan Sanjeef3,Cipolli William4,Smith Hayden2

Affiliation:

1. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care

2. University of South Carolina

3. Queen's University

4. Colgate University

Abstract

Abstract The proliferation of suicide and self-harm content on social media platforms has emerged as a pressing concern in recent years, reflecting broader societal challenges surrounding mental health and online safety. In response to these concerns, platforms like Twitter (now “X”) have implemented policies aimed at curtailing the spread of such content and promoting user safety. The current study investigated the impact of Twitter's Suicide and Self-Harm Policy through a content analysis of tweets before and after its enactment, focusing on categorizing tweets according to slant, tweet category, and theme. A corpus of 3846 tweets was analyzed. Within this corpus, tweets spanning 32 weeks from October 18, 2018, to May 29, 2019, were selected. These dates were chosen to encompass approximately 16 weeks before and after the enactment of the policy on February 7, 2018. The analysis revealed notable shifts in the discourse surrounding self-harm, with discernible impacts attributed to the implementation of Twitter's policy. While the policy appeared to stimulate increased discussions aimed at fostering a better understanding of self-harm, it also underscored the necessity for social media platforms to delineate between factual information and personal opinions. However, the dissemination of personal accounts and experiences within these discussions served as a conduit for peer support, potentially offering invaluable assistance to individuals grappling with self-harm issues. Taken together, while policy interventions can stimulate constructive dialogue, careful consideration must be given to balancing factual accuracy with the provision of spaces for personal expression and support within online communities.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3