Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2. UFF
3. UFRGS
4. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
5. Universidade Federal do Pampa
6. Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing
7. UFJF
8. Universidade Federal Fluminense
Abstract
Abstract
Worldwide, parenthood remains a major driver for the reduced participation of women in the job market, where discrimination stems from people's biases against mothers, based on stereotypes and misconceptions surrounding the vision of motherhood in our society. In academia, parenthood may be equally perceived as negatively affecting scientists' commitment and dedication, especially for women. Our survey conducted amongst Brazilian scientists found that mothers self-reported a higher prevalence of negative bias in their workplace when compared to fathers. The perception of a negative bias was influenced by gender and career status, but not by race, scientific field or number of children. Regarding intersections, mothers with less than 15 years of hiring reported having suffered a higher rate of negative bias against them. We discuss implications of these results and suggest how this negative bias should be addressed in order to promote an equitable environment that does not harm women in science.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Signaling devotion to work over family undermines the motherhood penalty;Aranda B;Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,2014
2. Areas, R., Abreu, A.R. de P., Santana, A.E., Barbosa, M.C., Nobre, C., 2020. Gender and the Scissors Graph of Brazilian Science: From Equality to Invisibility., http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/m6eb4.
3. Overcoming) Maternity Bias in the Workplace: A Systematic Review;Arena DF;Journal of Management,2022
4. Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty;Benard S;Gender & Society,2010
5. The Wage Penalty for Motherhood;Budig MJ;American Sociological Review,2001