Isolating sensory artifacts in the suprathreshold TMS-EEG signal over DLPFC

Abstract

Abstract Objective Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is an effective way to evaluate neurophysiological processes at the level of the cortex. To further characterize the TMS-evoked potential (TEP) generated with TMS-EEG, beyond the motor cortex, we aimed to distinguish between cortical reactivity to TMS versus non-specific somatosensory and auditory co-activations using both single-pulse and paired-pulse protocols at suprathreshold stimulation intensities over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Method Fifteen right-handed healthy participants received six blocks of stimulation including single and paired TMS delivered as active-masked (i.e., TMS-EEG with auditory masking and foam spacing), active-unmasked (TMS-EEG without auditory masking and foam spacing) and sham (sham TMS coil). We evaluated cortical excitability following single-pulse TMS, and cortical inhibition following a paired-pulse paradigm (long-interval cortical inhibition (LICI)). Results Repeated measure ANOVAs revealed significant differences in mean cortical evoked activity (CEA) of active-masked, active-unmasked, and sham conditions for both the single-pulse (F(1.76, 24.63)=21.88 , p<0.001, η2=0.61) and LICI (F(1.68, 23.49)=10.09 , p<0.001, η2=0.42) protocols. Furthermore, global mean field amplitude (GMFA) differed significantly across the three conditions for both single-pulse (F(1.85, 25.89)=24.68 , p<0.001, η2=0.64) and LICI (F(1.8, 25.16)=14.29 , p<0.001, η2=0.5). Finally, only active LICI protocols but not sham stimulation ([active-masked (0.78±0.16, P<0.0001)], [active-unmasked (0.83±0.25, P<0.01)]) resulted in significant signal inhibition. Conclusion While previous findings of a significant somatosensory and auditory contribution to the evoked EEG signal is replicated by our study, an artifact attenuated cortical reactivity can reliably be measured in TMS-EEG signal with suprathreshold stimulation of DLPFC. Artifact attenuation can be accomplished using standard procedures and even when masked, the level of cortical reactivity is still far above what is produced by sham stimulation. Significance Our study illustrates that TMS-EEG of DLPFC remains a valid investigational tool.