Arterial blood pressure monitoring using three different technologies during neuro radiological procedure: a prospective, monocentric, observational study

Author:

Chapalain Xavier1,Morvan Thomas1,Gentric Jean-Christophe1,Subileau Aurélie1,Jacob Christophe1,Cadic Anna1,Caillard Anaïs1,Huet Olivier1

Affiliation:

1. University and Regional Hospital Centre Brest

Abstract

Abstract

Background In the perioperative setting, the most accurate way to continuously measure Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP) is using an arterial catheter. Surrogate methods such as finger cuff have been developped to allow non invasive measurements and are increasingly used, but needs further evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate accuracy and clinical concordance between three devices for the measurement of ABP during neuroradiological procedure. Methods This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study. All consecutive patients undergoing a neuro radiological procedure were eligible. Patients who needed arterial catheter for blood pressure measurement were included. During neuroradiological procedure, ABP (systolic, mean and diatolic blood pressure) was measured with three different technologies: radial artery catheter, Arm Cuff and Nexfin. Bland-Altman and error grid analysis were performed to evaluat accuracy and clinical concordance between devices. Results From March 2022 to November 2022, we included 50 patients, mostly ASA 3 (60%) and required a cerebral embolization (94%) under general anaesthesia (96%). Compare to artery catheter, a significant relationship was found for SAP (r2 = 0.78) and MAP (r2 = 0.80) with the Nexfin (p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were respectively 9.6 mmHg (-15.6 to 34.8 mmHg) and − 0.8 mmHg (-17.2 to 15.6 mmHg), for SAP and MAP. We found a significant relationship for SAP (r2 = 0.82) and MAP (r2 = 0.74) with Arm Cuff (p < 0.001). Bias and LOA were respectively 5.8 mmHg (-30.4 to 22.9 mmHg) and − 1.4 mmHg (-17.3 to 14.4 mmHg), for SAP and MAP. Error grid analysis showed that 99% of non-invasive ABP measures obtained with the Nexfin and Arm Cuff were located in the risk zone A or B. Conclusions Despite an inaccuracy which are larger than acceptable, ABP measurement with non-invasive devices induced almost no changes in individual patient care during neuro radiological procedure. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05283824

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference32 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3