Development and clinical assessment of new topical cream containing postbiotic in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis
Author:
Moazzen Nasrin1, Ahanchian Hamid1, Golmohammadzadeh Shiva1, Delaram Kiana1, Sadeghi Tahereh1, Masroor Amir Hosein1, Khameneh Bahman1
Affiliation:
1. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the major common chronic inflammatory dermatologic disorder in children. Postbiotics are bioactive compounds derived from probiotics, inanimate microorganisms, and/or their components. In the current study, we aimed to prepare, characterize, and clinically evaluate postbiotic cream in pediatric patients.
Methods
After preparing different formulations, the formulations were evaluated for stability and physicochemical properties for semi-solids, such as physical properties, viscosity, temperature cycle, and pH. Finally, a formulation that showed better physical properties was chosen for further investigation. The study was performed on patients with AD referred to the outpatient allergy clinic. The primary outcomes were assessed with the SCORAD index and changes in the proportion of children with clinical improvement/no improvement, deterioration, and recurrence rate.
Results
The final formulation's pH was 6.00 ± 0.02. In addition, the centrifugation test showed that this formulation was completely homogeneous after centrifugation. The temperature cycle test indicated no change in the structure of the cream. After a two-month follow-up, the mean SCOARD score was 50 ± 14.5 at baseline and 27.8 ± 10 at the final visit in the postbiotic group. It was also 43 ± 12 at baseline and 28.2 ± 6 at the final visit in the placebo group. After four months, eleven patients had a recurrence in lesions: 2 in the postbiotic group, 6.9% versus 9 in the placebo group, 30%).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that postbiotic formulation is cutaneously acceptable and showed a clinically significant improvement, especially in long-term follow-up.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. 1. T. Torres, E. Ferreira, M. Gonçalo, P. Mendes-Bastos, M. Selores, P. Filipe, Update on atopic dermatitis, Acta medica portuguesa 2019, 32, 606–613. 2. 2. G. Sanclemente, N. Hernandez, D. Chaparro, L. Tamayo, A. Lopez, Á. López, A. Cortes, Á. Seidel, C.I. Ortiz, C. Arenas, Epidemiologic features and burden of atopic dermatitis in adolescent and adult patients: A cross-sectional multicenter study, World Allergy Organization Journal 2021, 14, 100611. 3. 3. L. Schneider, S. Tilles, P. Lio, M. Boguniewicz, L. Beck, J. LeBovidge, N. Novak, D. Bernstein, J. Blessing-Moore, D. Khan, Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2013, 131, 295–299. e227. 4. 4. V. Aoki, D. Lorenzini, R.L. Orfali, M.C. Zaniboni, Z.N.P.d. Oliveira, M.C. Rivitti-Machado, R. Takaoka, M.B. Weber, T. Cestari, B. Gontijo, Consensus on the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis-Brazilian Society of Dermatology, Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 2019, 94, 67–75. 5. 5. T. Hajar, Y.A. Leshem, J.M. Hanifin, S.T. Nedorost, P.A. Lio, A.S. Paller, J. Block, E.L. Simpson, A systematic review of topical corticosteroid withdrawal (“steroid addiction”) in patients with atopic dermatitis and other dermatoses, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2015, 72, 541–549. e542.
|
|