Association of optimal gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies in China: a multicenter retrospective study

Author:

Xiao Yue1,Sun Guoqiang2,Zou Xiaoxuan3,Deng Yuzhi4,Liang Fei1,Ma Qiuping5,Cheng Yao2,Ding Yaling1,Liu Haiyan3,Cao Yingying6,Yang Haishan3,Zhong Yi1,Hu Meina3,Yin Jieyun1,Yang Ying4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou

2. Department of Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan

3. Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing

4. National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing

5. Department of obstetrics and gynecology, the affiliated Taicang People’s Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou

6. Women and Children Health Care Center of Taicang, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province

Abstract

Abstract Background: There is no well-established gestational weight gain (GWG) guideline for twin pregnancies in China. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study containing 1247 twin pregnancies was conducted in both North and South China. Optimal GWG was defined as the interquartile range (IQR) of GWG across pre-pregnancy body mass index stratum among low-risk women. A primary outcome is defined as any occurrence of preterm delivery, small for gestational age, large for gestational age and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Results: On the basis of 203 low-risk participants, we found that the optimal total GWG were 16-21.80 kg, 15.35-21.50 kg, 12.10-20.25 kg, and 5.50-18.50 kg for underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese subgroups, respectively; corresponding GWG rates were 0.43-0.61 kg/week, 0.42-0.59 kg/week, 0.34-0.55 kg/week, and 0.15-0.51 kg/week. Our proposed GWG ranges are lower than the provisional Institute of Medicine (IOM) twin recommendation but higher than the Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) singleton recommendation. In addition, 46.11% of participants gain appropriate weight according to our suggestion, in contrast to 43.48% and 23.82% for the IOM twin guideline and the CNS singleton recommendation, respectively. Furthermore, the magnitude of association between the composite outcome with insufficient GWG defined by our suggestion was the strongest [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) =1.74 (1.21-2.49)] among recommendations. Noteworthy, the IQRs produced by our study seems to be superior to the IOM twin guideline in southern Chinese but not in northern Chinese. Conclusion: Our study emphasizes the necessity of establishing official GWG guideline for Chinese twin pregnancies, and regional-specific guidelines may need to be considered.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3