Surgical Cholecystectomy Score (SCS) for grading the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Author:

S Kruthika1,Asuri Krishna1,Singh Deepti1,Prakash Om1,Rai Sanjeet1,Ramachandran Rashmi1,Kumar Subodh1,Bansal Virinder Kumar1

Affiliation:

1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for symptomatic gall stone disease. A good scoring system is necessary to standardize the reporting. Our aim was to develop and validate an objective scoring system, the Surgical Cholecystectomy Score (SCS) to grade the difficulty of LC. Methods:The study was conducted in a single surgical unit at a tertiary care hospital in two phases from January 2017 to April 2021. Retrospective data was analysed and the difficulty of each procedure was graded according to the modified Nassar’s scoring system. Significant preoperative and intraoperative data obtained was given a weightage score. In phase II, these scores were validated on a prospective cohort. Each procedure was classified either as easy, moderately difficult or difficult. Statistical analysis: A univariate analysis was performed on the data followed by a multivariate regression analysis. Bidirectional stepwise selection was done to select the most significant variables. The Beta /Schneeweiss scoring system was used to generate a rounded risk score. Results: Data of 800 patients was retrieved and graded. 10 intraoperative parameters were found to be significant. Each variable was assigned a rounded risk score. The final SCS range for intraoperative parameters was 0-15. The scoring system was validated on a cohort of 249 LC. In the final scoring, cut off SCS of >8 was found to correlate with difficult procedures. Score of < 2 was equivalent to easy LC. A score between 2 and 8 indicated moderate difficulty. The area under ROC curve was 0.98 and 0.92 for the intraoperative score indicating that the score was an excellent measure of the difficulty level of LCs. Conclusion: The scoring system developed in this study has shown an excellent correlation with the difficulty of LC. It needs to be validated in different cohorts and across multiple centers further.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy;Griffiths EA;Surg Endosc,2019

2. Risk factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multivariate analysis;Kanakala V;Int J Surg Lond Engl,2011

3. Preoperative Prediction of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Scoring Method;Agrawal N;Niger J Surg Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc,2015

4. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Jayaraj P;World J Surg,2022

5. Optimal Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography | Gorla | Journal of Current Surgery. https://www.currentsurgery.org/index.php/jcs/article/view/230/172. Accessed 30 Apr 2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3