Textbook outcome contributes to long-term prognosis in older adults with gastric cancer

Author:

Morito Atsushi1,Iwatsuki Masaaki1,Maeda Yuto1,Misuura Chishou1,Hara Yoshihiro1,Matsumoto Chihiro1,Toihata Tasuku1,Kosumi Keisuke1,Eto Kojiro1,Baba Yoshifumi1,Iwagami Shiro1,Miyamoto Yuji1,Yoshida Naoya1,Baba Hideo1

Affiliation:

1. Kumamoto University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measurement of short-term outcomes for evaluating surgical procedures. We investigated whether TO can be used to predict outcomes after curative gastric cancer (GC) surgery in older adults. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 465 consecutive patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for GC from 2005 to 2017. Among these, 141 advanced-age patients were eligible. The patients were divided into two groups: those who achieved TO (a-TO group) and those who failed to achieve TO (f-TO group). In accordance with previous reports, TO consisted of eight metrics. We evaluated the association between TO and long-term survival. Results TO was achieved 73 (52%) patients. The patients in the f-TO group had a significantly higher body mass index (P = 0.01), longer surgery time (P = 0.03), and more blood loss (P = 0.001). The metric with the lowest achievement rate was “no postoperative severe complication.” The patients in the f-TO group had significantly shorter overall survival than those in the a-TO group (P = 0.03). Multivariable Cox regression analyses of overall survival revealed that an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of 3 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68–5.26; P = 0.0002), presence of lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03–3.35; P = 0.04), and f-TO (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04–3.19; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with poor overall survival. Conclusion TO can be used to predict outcomes after curative GC surgery in patients of advanced age.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3