Improving Pain Assessment, Documentation and Analgesic Prescription Practices Among Clinicians

Author:

Batanda Ian1,Natuhwera Germans2

Affiliation:

1. Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital

2. Hospice Africa Uganda (HAU) - Little Hospice Hoima

Abstract

Abstract

Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines on pain assessment, clinicians do not adequately use pain-scoring tools to assess pain and document pain scores in patients’ clinical notes. This is partly because pain assessment tools may not always be available in clinical areas. However, even when available, clinicians may not have adequate knowledge and experience in using them. This analytical cross-sectional study sought to assess whether a CME on pain assessment followed by displaying pain assessment tools in clinical duty stations would improve clinicians’ pain rating, documentation, and analgesic prescription practices at Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital. The primary outcome was improved documentation of pain scoring and pain severity rating over time. The study found a short-lived improvement in pain rating and analgesic prescription. The results suggest that rooted knowledge of pain assessment could be more beneficial in empowering clinicians to perform and document pain assessment sustainably.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Cancer Pain Management—New Therapies;Zhang H;Curr Oncol Rep,2022

2. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey;Gan TJ;Curr Med Res Opin,2014

3. Chen J (Steven), Kandle PF, Murray IV, et al. Physiology, Pain. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539789/ (2024, accessed 3 April 2024).

4. The Revised IASP definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises;Raja SN;Pain,2020

5. Definition of PAIN, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pain (2024, accessed 3 April 2024).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3