The efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery: a protocol for systematic review and meta- analysis

Author:

Li Qiujiang1,YangMasood Umar2,Zhang Zhuang1,Feng Ganjun1,Yang Huiliang1,Song Yueming1

Affiliation:

1. West China Hospital of Sichuan University

2. University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Abstract

Abstract Introduction As hemostasis is a complex process that bleeding can be difficult to control, higher requirements are needed for spinal surgeons in intraoperative hemostasis. Floseal and Surgiflo are two common thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents. Nevertheless, Floseal or Surgiflo has not been universally recommended by the current guidelines of preoperative hemostatic management in spine surgery due to lack of relative systematic evidence-based medical evidence. Moreover, adverse effects of novel absorbable hemostatic biomaterial may be poorly reported and inconsistently described. Meanwhile, there is currently no systematic review and meta-analyses available which sum up the existing evidence. Our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery, and to provide corresponding evidence-based medical evidence. Methods and analysis Our study will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P). Two authors will retrieve the relevant articles using the eight databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM) from inception to 16st Aug, 2022. Three authors will screen citation titles and abstracts and evaluated full-text of each potentially relevant citation, and then extract the data using a data extraction form. Any discrepancies in decisions between reviewers will be resolved through discussion. All included studies will be evaluated for quality and risk of bias according to the Cochrane guidelines. A subgroup analysis and a sensitivity analysis will be used to find the main source of between-study heterogeneity. All data analysis will be performed using RevMan v.5.3 Software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Interventions to minimize blood loss and transfusion risk in spine surgery: A narrative review[J];Pennington Z;Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2020

2. Blood-loss Management in Spine Surgery[J];Bible JE;J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2018

3. Perioperative Blood Management in Pediatric Spine Surgery[J];Oetgen ME;J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2017

4. Le Huec J C, Aleissa S, Bowey A J, et al. Hemostats in Spine Surgery: Literature Review and Expert Panel Recommendations[J]. Neurospine,2022,19(1):1–12.

5. Influence of K-line on intraoperative and hidden blood loss in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament when undergoing unilateral open-door laminoplasty[J];Li Y;J Orthop Surg Res,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3