Next Generation Sequence-Based Targeted Somatic Mutation Analysis in Thyroid Nodules with Pathologically Diagnosed as Indeterminate Cytology
Author:
Kök Gizem1, Nart Deniz2, Ertan Yeşim2, Özbek Suha Sureyya2, Mizrak Ali2, Makay Özer2, Erdoğan Mehmet2, Özışık Hatice2, Akın Haluk2, Durmaz Burak2, Özgür Su2, Özdemir Murat2, Karaca Emin2
Affiliation:
1. Tepecik Educational and Research Hospital 2. Ege University School of Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules remains a topic of ongoing debate, particularly regarding the differentiation of malignancy. Somatic mutation analysis offers crucial insights into tumor characteristics. This study aimed to assist the clinical management of indeterminate nodules with somatic mutation analysis.
Methods: Aspiration samples from 20 indeterminate thyroid nodules were included in the study. A next-generation sequencing panel containing 67 genes was used for molecular profiling. The results were compared with pathology data from surgical material, which is considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.
Results: Variants in six genes (NRAS, BRAF, TP53, TERT, PTEN, PIK3CA) were detected in 10 out of 20 samples. We identified nine Tier 1 or 2 variants in 10 (67%) out of 15 malignant nodules (NRAS, BRAF, TP53, TERT, PTEN, PIK3CA) and one Tier 2 (PIK3CA) variant in one out of five benign nodules. The study demonstrated an NPV of 40%, a PPV of 90%, a specificity of 60%, and a sensitivity of 80%.
Conclusion: Based on the detected molecular markers, at least nine patients (45%) could be managed correctly without needing a repeat FNAB attempt. This study underscores the clinical practicality of molecular tests in managing nodules with indeterminate cytology. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of considering the patient's age when determining the DNA- or RNA-based genetic testing method. Finally, we discussed the significance of the somatic mutation profile and its impact on the current pathological classification.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. 159, 676 (2014). 2. B. R. Haugen, E. K. Alexander, K. C. Bible, G. M. Doherty, S. J. Mandel, Y. E. Nikiforov, F. Pacini, G. W. Randolph, A. M. Sawka, M. Schlumberger, K. G. Schuff, S. I. Sherman, J. A. Sosa, D. L. Steward, R. M. Tuttle, and L. Wartofsky, Thyroid 26, 1 (2016). 3. Z. W. Baloch, S. L. Asa, J. A. Barletta, R. A. Ghossein, C. C. Juhlin, C. K. Jung, V. A. LiVolsi, M. G. Papotti, M. Sobrinho-Simões, G. Tallini, and O. Mete, Endocr Pathol 33, 27 (2022). 4. T. M. Khan and M. A. Zeiger, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11, (2020). 5. C. Hu, W. Jing, Q. Chang, Z. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Cao, L. Zhao, Y. Sun, C. Wang, H. Zhao, T. Xiao, and H. Guo, Mol Oncol 16, 1680 (2022).
|
|