Affiliation:
1. Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires
2. King Saud University
3. Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences
4. University of Western Ontario
5. Western University Radiation Oncologist
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A previous study in HPV-positive patients have shown that transoral surgical resectability (TOS) is a strong prognostic factor for patients with T1-2 disease undergoing radiotherapy (RT), but it is unclear whether this holds for HPV-negative patients, in whom the biology is different and outcomes are worse. We aimed to compare outcomes of potential TOS-candidates vs. non-TOS candidates, among patients who underwent RT/CRT for early T-stage human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-negative) OPSCC.
Methods
For patients treated with RT/CRT for early-stage HPV-negative OPSCC between 2014 and 2021, pretreatment imaging was reviewed by four head-and-neck surgeons, blinded to outcomes, to assess primary-site suitability for TOS, and extracapsular extension (ECE) was assessed by a head-and-neck neuroradiologist. We compared outcomes based on surgical resectability relating to: 1) the primary site tumor alone, and 2) the primary site plus the absence/presence of ECE (overall assessment). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the log-rank test, with Cox regression for multivariable modeling.
Results
Seventy patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 63.1 years and the majority of the patients were male 39/70 (55.7%). The primary site was TOS-favorable in 46/70 (66%). Based on the overall assessment (including the primary site and positive lymph nodes), 41/70 (58.6%) were TOS-favorable. The 3-year OS, DSS and PFS for primary site TOS-favorable vs. unfavorable were OS: 76.9% vs. 37.4%; DSS: 78.1% vs 46.2%, PFS: 69.9% vs 41.3%, (log-rank test = 0.01, 0.03, 0.04; respectively). Additionally, patients with an overall assessment of TOS favorability demonstrated better survival outcomes compared with TOS-unfavorable patients (OS: 77.3% vs. 46.2%; DSS: 78.2% vs. 56.5%, PFS: 72.3% vs. 42.1%, log-rank test = 0.01, 0.04, 0.01; respectively).
Conclusion
Patients with TOS-favorable HPV-negative early T-stage OPSCC have superior survival outcomes than TOS-unfavorable patients. This critical confounder needs to be considered when comparing primary surgical and primary radiation clinical trials and retrospective studies.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer;-Ang KK;N Engl J Med,2010
2. Hpv-associated head and neck cancer: A virus-related cancer epidemic;-Marur S;Lancet Oncol,2010
3. Increase in primary surgical treatment of t1 and t2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and rates of adverse pathologic features: National cancer data base;-Cracchiolo JR;Cancer,2016
4. Novel strategies to effectively de-escalate curative-intent therapy for patients with hpv-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Current and future directions;-Price KAR;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2020
5. -Ferris RL, Flamand Y, Weinstein GS et al. Phase ii randomized trial of transoral surgery and low-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy in resectable p16 + locally advanced oropharynx cancer: An ecog-acrin cancer research group trial (e3311). J Clin Oncol 2021:JCO2101752.