Accuracy and lower limits for iodine quantification in dual-energy CT with deep learning reconstruction

Author:

Shiotsuki Kenshi1ORCID,Tokurei Shogo2ORCID,Kuramoto Taku3,Shiroo Tomoaki1,Noto Daichi4,Asayama Yoshiki5

Affiliation:

1. Oita University Hospital: Oita Daigaku Igakubu Fuzoku Byoin

2. Junshin Gakuen University: Junshin Gakuen Daigaku

3. Kobe Tokiwa University: Kobe Tokiwa Daigaku

4. Canon Medical Systems Corporation: Canon Medical Systems Kabushiki Kaisha

5. Oita University Faculty of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Iodine quantification is a diagnostic indicator of vascularization in lesions; however, accurate and repeatable measurements, especially at low iodine concentrations, are challenging due to the limits of instruments used for iodine quantification. Measurements of iodine concentrations below the instrument limits are unrepeatable and can lead to misdiagnoses. Although the accuracies of iodine quantification have been reported, no prior studies have comprehensively examined the limits of the instrument. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ) of iodine quantification using fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). We used iodine inserts with seven nominal iodine concentration and performed DECT scans in small and large phantom at different CT dose indexes. We assessed accuracy using relative measurement errors, calculated the LOD using calibration curves between the nominal and measured iodine densities, and examined the LOQ using the relative standard deviation of repeated measurements. We found that LOD and LOQ decreased with increasing CT dose indices and were lower for the small phantom than for the large phantom. The measured iodine densities plateaued for 0.3 and 0.5 mgI/mL in small and large phantoms, respectively, and these results indicate the limits of instrument used for iodine quantification. The relative measurement errors decreased with increasing nominal iodine concentrations above the LOD or LOQ levels. However, no clear trend was observed below these limits. Therefore, these findings revealed the necessity of a comprehensive evaluation of accuracy and LOD/LOQ for iodine quantification to diagnose lesions reliably with iodine density.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3