Normative convergence between global health security and universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of international health negotiations in the wake of COVID-19

Author:

Lal Arush1,Wenham Clare1,Parkhurst Justin1

Affiliation:

1. London School of Economics and Political Science

Abstract

Abstract

Background The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the WHO Thirteenth General Programme of Work (2019–2023) underscored the importance of mitigating health emergencies alongside ensuring accessible and affordable health services. Key to these efforts are global health security (GHS) and universal health coverage (UHC), which serve as both standalone goals as well as cross-cutting approaches to health policy and practice. While GHS and UHC each function as distinct norms, global health stakeholders increasingly argue that advancing them synergistically may better address interconnected health challenges amidst greater resource constraints. However, little is understood about the extent of convergence between GHS and UHC norms, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative study assesses normative convergence between GHS and UHC by tracing their development through iterative draft texts across two recent international health negotiations – specifically unpacking the expression of UHC norms in the WHO Pandemic Agreement, and GHS norms in the 2023 UNGA Political Declaration on Universal Health Coverage. Results The findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic created a policy window uniquely-positioned to foster normative convergence between GHS and UHC. Both international agreements advanced GHS and UHC convergence by demonstrating increased complementarity and interdependency between the two norms. However, sustaining this proved difficult, as negotiators made political and operational trade-offs which sometimes undermined normative convergence. Conclusions This study provides a nuanced account of how global health norms evolve through integration in complex policy environments – finding that normative convergence may not always be explicit, but rather implicit through incremental linkages in their underlying discourse and core functions. This research contributes to pragmatic efforts by global health actors seeking consensus amidst an era of polycrisis, and highlights the importance of navigating geopolitics and overcoming path dependencies. It also enhances scholarly understanding of the dynamic process of norm convergence through health diplomacy.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3