Affiliation:
1. New Jersey Institute of Technology
2. New Jersey State Police Hazard Mitigation Unit
3. Rutgers University School of Environmental and Biological Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Roadside ditches are one of the most common landscape features in an urbanizing landscape. Poorly maintained ditches exacerbate floods and degrade water quality. Roadside ditch retrofitting offers a unique opportunity to address both water quantity and quality issues related to stormwater. However, given the extensiveness of roadside ditches, it is challenging to determine where the retrofitting efforts should take place. The study proposed a three-step procedure to prioritize roadside ditches for retrofitting based on the hydrological sensitivity and connectiveness of a landscape and applied it to the Neshanic River watershed with mixed land uses in Central New Jersey. Specifically, we delineated the hydrologically sensitive areas (HSAs) in the watershed that have high propensity to runoff generation and accumulation, selected the ditches intersecting with HSAs for consideration of retrofitting and finally ranked the selected ditches for retrofitting with high, medium and low priority based on their physical conditions. There were 853 ditches in 40.3 km mapped in the watershed, 322 ditches in 29.7 km were intersected with HSAs. Among 322 ditches considered for retrofitting, only 125 ditches were ranked for retrofitting with high priority. The study also applied the propensity score matching method to compare the conditions of the ditches that did and didn’t intersect with HSAs and found the ditches intersecting with HSAs were more likely experiencing deterioration that those not intersecting with HSAs. The proposed procedure is very useful tool to scout and prioritize roadside ditches for maintenance and improvement when personnel, time and other resources are limited.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Brown, Caraco (2004) USEPA/Center for Watershed Protection. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination: A Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicot City, MD
2. Modeling the hydrologic effects of roadside ditch networks on receiving waters;Buchanan B;J Hydrol,2013
3. Hydrological impact of roadside ditches in an agricultural watershed in Central New York: Implications for non-point source pollutant transport;Buchanan BP;Hydrol Process,2013
4. Clar ML, Traver RG, Clark SE, Lucas S, Lichten K, Ports MA, Poretsky A (2015) Low Impact Development Technology: Design Methods and Case Studies. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413883
5. Colwell S, Horner RR, Booth DB, Gilvydis D (2000) A Survey of Ditches Along County Roads for Their Potential to Affect Storm Runoff Water Quality [Technical Report]. University of Washington Center for Urban Water Resources Management. https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/19549