Affiliation:
1. Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
With the increase in aging populations and the progress of technology, lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion (LLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) has been gaining more and more interest and usage.
Objective
To explore the feasibility and advantages of LLIF in the treatment of DLS and to observe the outcome through measurements of clinical efficacy and imaging changes.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed for 52 DLS patients (12 males and 40 females, aged 65.84 ± 9.873 years) who underwent LLIF from January 2019 to January 2023. The operation time, blood loss, complications, clinical efficacy indicators (VAS, ODI, and SF-36), and imaging indicators (coronal position: Cobb angle and CSVL-C7PL; and sagittal position: LL, SVA, PI, and TK) were measured, and follow-up was carried out for these patients. The postoperative and follow-up measurements were compared to the preoperative values.
Results
All patients successfully completed the operation, with an overall operation time of 283.90 ± 81.62 min, total blood loss of 257.27 ± 213.44 ml, and no serious complications. The clinical efficacy indexes after surgery and at follow-up were significantly improved compared with the preoperative period (P < 0.001). Compared to the preoperative values, the Cobb angle and LL angle were significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, CSVL-C7PL, SVA, and TK did not change much after surgery (P > 0.05) but improved significantly at follow-up (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in PI at either the postoperative or follow-up timepoint.
Conclusion
LLIF showed less surgical bleeding, less trauma, and fast postoperative recovery, which can significantly restore and improve the balance of sagittal and coronal positions of the lumbar spine, and also improve the compensatory thoracic scoliosis.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Bess S et al. Recent and Emerging Advances in Spinal Deformity [J] Neurosurgery, 2017(Suppl.3): 80.
2. Biological principles of adult degenerative scoliosis;Petrosyan E;[J] Trends in molecular medicine,2023
3. Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Adult spinal deformity. [J] Lancet. Volume 394. London, England; 2019. pp. 160–72. 10193.
4. The prevalence of adult de novo scoliosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [J] European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society;McAviney J,2020
5. Wong E, Altaf F, Oh LJ, et al. Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis [J] Orthopedics. 2017;40(6):e930–9.