Exploring health equity integration among health service and delivery systems in Nova Scotia: Perspectives of health system partners

Author:

Yusuf Joshua1,D’Souza Ninoshka J.1,Caldwell Hilary A.T.1,Sim Sarah Meaghan2,Embrett Mark2,Kirk Sara F.L.1

Affiliation:

1. Dalhousie University

2. Nova Scotia Health

Abstract

Abstract

Background Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health provincially, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a focus group session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration. Results Eleven individual interviews and one focus group (n = 5 participants) were conducted, with a total of 16 participants. Half (n = 8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that the CFIR subdomains of Complexity, Innovation Design, Mission Alignment, Available Resources and Roles: Mid and High-level leaders were barriers to health equity integration. The perceived homogeneity of leadership and therefore their capability to understand health equity accounted for the identification of leaders as a barrier. Facilitators for health equity integration included the subdomains Partnerships and Connections, Policies and Laws, and Engagement as a multi-domain facilitator. Existing strategies within the health system were found to be inadequate to address inequities. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures and training resources need to be put in place to support health equity integration.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization. 1986 [cited 2020 Sep 24]. http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/.

2. World Health Organization. Health Equity [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2022 Nov 17]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity#tab=tab_1.

3. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2006 [cited 2024 Mar 16]. https://dssbr.ensp.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/European-strategies-for-tackling-social-inequities-1.pdf.

4. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 1 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2006 [cited 2024 Mar 16]. https://www.enothe.eu/cop/docs/concepts_and_principles.pdf.

5. World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health - Final report of the commission on social determinants of health (executive summary) [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland. 2008 [cited 2024 Mar 20]. Report No.: WHO/IER/CSDH/08.1. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/69832/WHO_IER_CSDH_08.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3