Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in sedation, analgesia, and vital signs in patients undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy: a single-blind control trial

Author:

Behnaz Faranak1,Asgari Sogol2,Bazgir Narges3,Kordjazi Mohammadsmaeil3,Sezari Parisa4

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, Anesthesiology Department, Shohadae Tajrish hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,

2. Assistant Professor, Anesthesiology Department, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

3. Hearing Disorders Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

4. Assistant Professor, Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background: stereotactic frame-based brain biopsy is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist decreases heart rate, blood pressure, and stress response. Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid receptor agonist. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on sedation, hemodynamic alterations, analgesia, and recovery profile of patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy. Method: a single-blind clinical trial was conducted. Forty patients with American society of anesthesiology(ASA) class II were included. Initially, local anesthesia was administered and stereotactic frames were installed, then patients were transferred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Afterward, patients were randomly divided into two groups: The R group which received remifentanil, and the D group which received dexmedetomidine. Blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) of all included cases were recorded throughout the operation. After transferring to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the visual analog score (VAS) and the amount of consumed morphine by each patient were measured. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22. Descriptive analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent t-test were performed. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: forty consecutive patients consisting of 22 males and 18 females were included. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. After conducting statistical analysis, it was revealed that RSS was higher in the R group. Indicating a higher level of sedation. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were all higher in the D group. Furthermore, the VAS and consumed morphine were lower in the D group. Conclusion: The RSS was higher in the R group, indicating a higher level of sedation in patients who received remifentanil. All recorded vital signs were higher in the D group. implicating that the vital signs were more stable during the operation in patients who received dexmedetomidine. In addition, the VAS and dose of consumed morphine in PACU were lower in the D group. Trial registration: the current study was registered in The Iranian registry clinical trial (code =IRCT20210415050983N2).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. Jr. The incidence of unexpected pathological findings in an image-guided biopsy series: a review of 100 consecutive cases;Friedman WA;Neurosurgery

2. Intraindividual comparison of histopathological diagnosis obtained by stereotactic serial biopsy to open surgical resection specimen in patients with intracranial tumours;Reithmeier T;Clin Neurol Neurosurg

3. Alesch F, Kitz K, Koos WT, Ostertag CB. Diagnostic potential of stereotactic biopsy of midline lesions. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;53:33 – 6. PubMed PMID: 1803881. Epub 1991/01/01. eng.

4. Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases;Lefranc M;J Neurosurg

5. Increasing the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy using intraoperative histological smear;Mathon B;Clin Neurol Neurosurg

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3