Micro-Analysis of Unipolar Induction: Experiments with Multiple Magnet System

Author:

Chhotray Sushant Kumar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Microwave Tube Research and Development Center

Abstract

Abstract

The Faraday paradox, originating from the age-old unipolar induction experiment, challenges established principles of electromagnetic induction. Two conflicting hypotheses—the M and N hypotheses—compete to elucidate this enigma. While the former suggests that magnetic flux rotates with the magnet, the latter contends that flux remains stationary. Intriguingly, experimental evidence supports both theories. This study aims to enhance understanding of the unipolar theory by leveraging the flux-cutting law of electromagnetic induction. Key concepts, including magnetic domain theory, relative angular velocity, and the flux-cutting rule, will be outlined, along with an analysis of unipolar induction results. The measurement circuit, or external circuit, is part of the closed circuit and interacts with the magnetic field to induce electromotive force, which is included in the analysis. A novel experiment utilizing multiple magnets, collectively equivalent to a single magnet, is devised and executed to gain deeper insight into the mechanism of unipolar induction. The seat of electromotive force is localized in the circuit under study, and its dynamic behavior is found to be instrumental in explaining the outcomes of unipolar induction. This study also highlights the paradoxical nature of Faraday's experiment, the contrasting hypotheses, the experimental outcomes, and the role of the flux cutting rule in resolving the conundrum.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. On some new electro-magnetical motions, and on the theory of magnetism;Faraday M;Q J Sci,1821

2. On some new Electro-Magnetical Motions, and on the Theory of Magnetism;Faraday M;Quart J Sci Lit Arts

3. Experimental Researches in Electricity;Faraday M;Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond,1832

4. Electrodynamics of moving bodies;Einstein A;Ann d Phys,1905

5. Panofsky WKH, Phillips M (1962) Classical Electricity and Magnetism. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Second Edition

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3