How to estimate the probability of a live birth after one or more complete IVF cycles?The development of a novel model in a single-center

Author:

Kong Xiangyi1,Liu Zhiqiang1,Huang Chunyu1,Hu Xiuyu1,Mo Meilan1,Zhang Hongzhan1,Zeng Yong1

Affiliation:

1. Reproductive Center of Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Abstract

Abstract Objective To estimate the probability of a live birth for an infertile couple after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) by using a Cox regression and Nomogram model. Methods A retrospective study for establishing a prediction model was conducted in the reproductive center of Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital. A total of 4413 patients who completed ovarian stimulation treatment and reached the trigger were involved. 70% of the patients were randomly placed into the training set (n = 3089) and the remaining 30% of the patients were placed into the validation set (n = 1324) randomly. Live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) were calculated for one retrieval cycle and the subsequent five frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Proportional Hazards (PH) Assumption test was used for selecting the parameter in the predictive model. A Cox regression model was built based on the basis of training set, and ROC curves were used to test the specificity and sensitivity of the prediction model. Subsequently, the validation set was applied to verify the validity of the model. Finally, for a more intuitive assessment of the CLBR more intuitively for clinicians and patients, a Nomogram model was established based on predictive model. By calculating the scores of the model, the clinicians could more effectively predict the probability for an individual patient to obtain at least one live birth. Result(s): In the fresh embryo transfer cycle, the LBR was 38.7%. In the first to fifth FET cycle, the optimal estimate and conservative estimate CLBRs were 59.95%, 65.41%, 66.35%, 66.58%, 66.61% and 56.81%, 60.84%, 61.50%, 61.66%, 61.68%, respectively. Based on PH test results, the potential predictive factors for live birth were insemination method, infertility factors, serum progesterone level (R = 0.043, p = 0.059), and luteinizing hormone level (R = 0.015, p = 0.499) on the day initiated with gonadotropin, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (R = -0.042, p = 0.069) and BMI (R = -0.035, p = 0.123). We used ROC curve to test the predictive power of the model. The AUC was 0.782 (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.764–0.801). Then the model was verified using the validation data. The AUC was 0.801 (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.774–0.828). A Nomogram model was built based on potential predictive factors that might influence the event of a live birth. Conclusion(s): The Cox regression and Nomogram prediction models effectively predicted the probability of infertile couples having a live birth. Therefore, this model could assist clinicians with making clinical decisions and providing guidance for patients. Trial registration: N/A.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference41 articles.

1. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care;Boivin J;Hum Reprod,2007

2. Occurrence of fertility problems presenting to primary care: population-level estimates of clinical burden and socioeconomic inequalities across the UK;Dhalwani N,2013

3. Polis C, Cox C, Tunçalp Ö, McLain A, Thoma M. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to Demographic and Health Survey data. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2017;32(5):1064-74.

4. Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Chambers G, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(6):1067-80.

5. Banker M, Dyer S, Chambers G, Ishihara O, Kupka M, de Mouzon J et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2013. Fertility and sterility. 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3