Affiliation:
1. Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
2. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
3. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
4. University of Turku
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of the current study was to assess the accuracy of expert predictions, which were derived using a Delphi panel foresight study in 2010, on a variety of drug-related topics in Finland in 2020.
Methods
The material used to evaluate the accuracy of the predictions consists of published reports on statistics, survey results, official register data, wastewater analyses and official documents. Whenever possible, we used multiple information sources to ascertain possible changes related to the predictions.
Results
In 2010, the majority – but not all – of the experts accurately predicted an increase in drug use. Indeed, more people experimented with or used drugs, and more drug residues were found in wastewater monitoring. The experts also correctly predicted an increase in population-level approval of drug use, but this development has been rather slow. Contrary to predictions, there was no marked increase in the use of new synthetic drugs. However, the misuse of buprenorphine increased during the 2010s. In the drug market, unit prices were surprisingly stable over the ten-year period. There were no changes in legislation related to the legal status of drugs, as was foreseen by the experts. However, enforcement moved in the direction foreseen by the experts: more lenient measures have been taken against users. Drug care system reforms favored a combination of mental health and addiction care units between 2010 and 2020, as foreseen by the experts.
Conclusions
It seems to have been easier for the experts to foresee the continuation of existing trends, e.g., increasing use of drugs or widening approval of drugs, than to predict possible changes in the popularity of distinct groups of drugs such as new psychoactive substances (NPS). Even armed with the prediction that drug imports and wholesale would increasingly fall into the domain of organized crime, this undesirable development could not be stopped. Expert disagreement can also be seen as a valuable indication of uncertainty regarding the future. Foresight related to drug-related issues can produce relatively accurate and realistic views of the future at least up to ten years ahead.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition;Rohrbeck R;Technol Forecast Soc Chang,2015
2. The evolution of Foresight: What evidence is there in scientific;Saritas O;publications? Futures,2022
3. The nature of strategic foresight research: A systematic literature review;Iden J;Technological Forecast Social Change Mar,2017
4. EU Strategic Foresight. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/strategic-planning/strategic-foresight_en Accessed 20 Sept 2023.
5. Drugs F. 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drugs-futures-2025 Accessed 20 Sept 2023.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献