How common are Medico-legal issues among Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Ethiopia: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Author:

Teklu Alula M.1,Bekelle Delayehu2,Surur Feiruz2,Kassa Munir3,Yirdaw Kesetebirhan D4,Taddesse Daniel1,Lamaro Tafesse5,Solomon Ananya2,Legese Tegene5,Kebede Birhanu2

Affiliation:

1. MERQ Consultancy (Ethiopia)

2. St. Paul Millenium Medical College

3. Director, Quality Improvement, Federal Ministry of Health

4. OneStop Urgent Care

5. Addis Ababa University

Abstract

Abstract

Background: One of the common challenges encountered by the Obstetrics and Gynecology (ObGyn) specialists is medico-legal issues including litigations for medical malpractice, lawsuits for medical errors and others. The magnitude of the challenges, perceptions and concerns are not well known. This study looked at these factors. Methods: a cross-sectional assessment of current encounters, experiences and perceptions of practicing ObGyn physicians who attended the Ethiopian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists conference in February 2016. A self-administered semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Descriptive statistics were done to determine the magnitude of the different issues in relation to medico-legal issues. Results: A total of 112 obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) were interviewed, median age of the participants was 40 years and only 8.9% were women. Close to half of them worked in Addis Ababa and the same proportion worked in the public sector. Nearly a third (34.8%) admitted making at least one error, 21.4% have been accused of malpractice, 21.4% were questioned by police/attorney and 6.3% were imprisoned. 83.3% of those who were questioned were declared free. 83% claimed to know someone who was accused of malpractice unfairly. Only 55.4% were aware of the role of the federal ethics committee. Conclusions: Many ObGyns are neither knowledgeable nor ready for management of medical error. There is a huge concern about the fairness of the treatment they receive for medical error lawsuits. Fear of litigation is enormous. Improving awareness about medical errors and their management paired with creating clarity on the roles of the federal ethics committee is highly needed. Bridging the gap between the judiciary system and the ObGyn society and addressing the disparity between the perceived susceptibility and the reality are crucial.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Preventing medico-legal issues in clinical practice;Raveesh BN;Ann Indian Acad Neurol,2016

2. Medico-legal litigation and its links with surgical anatomy;Ellis H;Surg (Oxford),2002

3. Riddick FA. The code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association. 2003;5:6–10.

4. The role of ethical principles in health care and the implications for ethical codes;Limentani AE;J Med Ethics,1999

5. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments;Hamasaki T;BMC Med Ethics,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3