Affiliation:
1. University of the Witwatersrand
Abstract
Abstract
In developing countries, such as those in Africa, the existence of empirical data characterising the chemical composition and ecological and health risks of solid mine wastes, such as asbestos, is extremely limited. While the geological properties and carcinogenic risks of asbestos fibres have been long-known and well-researched, the potential ecological impacts of exposed asbestos mine wastes and asbestos-bearing geological deposits have largely been ignored. In this study a preliminary assessment of heavy metal pollution from asbestos-mine wastes is presented using different pollution indices in the context of source contamination. The quantitative contamination indices (enrichment factor, geo-accumulation index (Igeo), contamination factor (Cf), degree of contamination (Cdegree) and pollution load index (PLI)), ecological risks and hazards quotient (HQ) were determined for chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite and anthophyllite mine waste types. The results indicate that the asbestos mine wastes contain high concentrations of heavy metals, greater than their respective background levels, with significant implications for ecological and human health risks.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference116 articles.
1. Heavy metal contamination of surface soil in relationship to land use patterns: A case study of Benue State;Adamu CL;Nigeria. J. of Measurement Science and Applications (JMSA),2010
2. The role of membrane technology in acid mine water treatment: a review;Agboola O;Kor. J. Chem. Eng,2019
3. A review on the impact of mining operation: Monitoring, assessment and management;Agboola O;Results Eng.,2020
4. Heavy metal enrichment and potential ecological risks from different solid mine wastes at a mine site in Ghana;Akoto R;Environ. Adv.,2021
5. Alfaro, M.R., Montero, A., Ugarte, O.M., Nascimento, Do, A., C.W., De Aguiar Accioly, A.M., Biondi, C.M. and Da Silva, Y.J.A.B. (2015): Background concentrations and ref- erence values for heavy metals in soils of Cuba. Environ. Monit. Assess., 187 (4198), 1–10.