Malaria misdiagnosis in the routine health system in Arba Minch area district in southwest Ethiopia: an implication for malaria control and elimination

Author:

Yigezu Engida1,Wondale Biniam1,Abebe Daniel2,Tamiru Girum1,Eligo Nigatu1,Lindtjørn Bernt3,Gadisa Endalamaw2,Tadesse Fitsum Girma2,Massebo Fekadu1

Affiliation:

1. Arba Minch University

2. Armauer Hansen Research Institute

3. University of Bergen

Abstract

Abstract Background Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) are the two widely used malaria diagnostic tools in Ethiopian health facilities. Accurate diagnosis is vital for appropriate treatment of cases to interrupt its transmission. Missing malaria cases, species misdiagnosis and false positive or negative reports might compromise the control and elimination effort. Therefore, this study assessed the status of species-specific misdiagnosis by microscope compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods A cross-sectional survey based on health facilities was conducted from November 2019 to January 2020. Results A total of 254 microscopically negative and 193 microscopically positive malaria cases were included. Of the 193 malaria positive cases, 46.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 38.9–53.4) (89/193) were Plasmodium falciparum infection, 52.3% (95% CI: 45.0-59.5) (101/193) were P. vivax infection, and 1.6% (3/193) had mixed infection of P. falciparum and P. vivax. Of the microscopically positive cases of P. falciparum, 84.3% (75/89) were confirmed as P. falciparum, 3.4% (3/89) were P. vivax and 11.2% (10/89) were mixed infections with P. falciparum and P. vivax and only one case was negative molecularly. Similarly, of the microscopically positive cases of P. vivax cases, 92.1% (93/101) were confirmed as P. vivax, 5.9% (6/101) were P. falciparum and 1% (1/101) was mixed infection. Single case was negative by molecular technique. Of the 254 microscopically negative cases, 0.8% of cases were tested positive for P. falciparum and 2% for P. vivax. Considering molecular technique as a reference, the sensitivity of microscopy for detecting P. falciparum was 89.2 and for P. vivax, it was 91.2. The specificity of microscopy for detecting P. falciparum was 96.1 and for P. vivax, it was 97.7. However, the sensitivity of microscopy in detecting mixed infection of P. falciparum and P. vivax was low (8.3%). Conclusion Based on our results, many P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infections were microscopically overlooked and underreported in the routine healthcare system. In addition, there were cases left untreated or inappropriately treated. Therefore, to minimise this problem, the gaps in the microscopic-based malaria diagnosis should be identified and regularly monitored to ensure the accuracy of the diagnosis.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. World malaria. report 2021. 2021.

2. Garcia LS, Malaria. Clin Lab Med. 2010;30:93–129.

3. Malaria diagnostic update: From conventional to advanced method;Fitri LE;J Clin Lab Anal,2022

4. A review of malaria diagnostic tools: Microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT);Wongsrichanalai C;Am J Trop Med Hyg,2007

5. Novel molecular diagnostic tools for malaria elimination: A review of options from the point of view of high-throughput and applicability in resource limited settings;Hopkins H;Malar J,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3