Affiliation:
1. The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives. We searched for the optimal cut-off value of the ultrasound double contour (DC) sign and the value of the DC sign combined with serum uric acid (SUA) for diagnosing gout.
Methods. Gout patients, rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis patients (RA/OA group), and healthy individuals were included in this study based on the inclusion criteria. SUA and the length of the DC sign in the knee and were detected and compared. The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing gout by DC sign and SUA were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We also plotted the ROC curve to compare the value of the ultrasound DC sign, SUA, and DC sign combined with SUA (in parallel and in series).
Results.In this study, we included 330 subjects (n = 110 in the gout group, 110 in the RA/OA group, and 110 in the healthy control group). The optimal cut-off value of the DC sign for the diagnosis of gout was 1.67 cm. The results of the ROC curve analysis showed that the DC sign in parallel SUA had the highest diagnostic value (1.67 cm), which was higher than the value recorded in combined detection based on the presence or absence of the DC sign.
Conclusions. The optimal cut-off value of the ultrasound DC sign for diagnosing gout was 1.67 cm; below this cut-off value, the DC sign in parallel SUA had the highest diagnostic value for gout and provided a reliable basis for the efficient diagnosis of gout.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Unravelling the mysteries of gout by multimodality imaging;Abdellatif W;Semin Arthritis Rheum,2020
2. Global status and trends in gout research from 2012 to 2021: a bibliometric and visual analysis;Wang Y;Clin Rheumatol,2023
3. Excess comorbidities in gout: the causal paradigm and pleiotropic approaches to care;Choi HK;Nat Rev Rheumatol,2021
4. The Association of Hyperuricemia and Gout With the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cohort and Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank;Zhu J;Front Med,2022
5. Neogi T, Jansen TLTA, Dalbeth N, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2015;67(10):2557–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39254. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative.