Medication-free treatment in mental health care. How does it differ from traditional treatment?

Author:

Standal Kari1,Solbakken Ole A.2,Rugkåsa Jorun3,Halvorsen Margrethe S.4,Abbass Allan5,Wirsching Christopher4,Brakstad Ingrid Engeseth4,Heiervang Kristin S.6

Affiliation:

1. District Psychiatric Center Nedre Romerike, Akershus University Hospital

2. University of Oslo, Department of psychology

3. Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital

4. Department of psychology, University of Oslo

5. Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University

6. Research and Development Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital and Centre of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo

Abstract

Abstract Background: Norwegian health authorities have implemented treatment units devoted to medication-free mental health treatment in all health regions to improve people’s freedom of choice. This article examines how medication-free treatment differs from treatment as usual across various central dimensions. Methods: The design was a preplanned, parallel, multi-sample, observational, mixed-methods design including questionnaire data obtained from a medication-free unit and two comparison units (n 59 + 124), as well as interviews with patients (n 5) and staff (n 8) in the medication-free unit. The medication-free unit was compared to data from comparison units on questionnaire data and participants’ other treatment (patents) or work (staff) experiences in interviews. Results: Medication-free treatment involved less reliance on medications and more extensive psychosocial treatment that involved a culture of openness, expression of feelings, and focus on individual responsibility and intensive work. The overall extent of patient influence for medication-free treatment compared with standard treatment was similar to standard treatment, but varied on different themes. Patients in medication-free treatment had more freedom to reduce or not use medication. Medication-free treatment was experienced as more demanding. For patients, this could be connected to a stronger sense of purpose and was experienced as helpful but could also be experienced as a type of pressure and lack of understanding. Patients in medication-free treatment reported greater satisfaction with the treatment, which may be linked to a richer psychosocial treatment package that focuses on patient participation and freedom from pressure to use medication. Conclusion: The findings provide insights into how a medication-free treatment service might work and show that it can be a viable alternative for people who are not comfortable with the current medication focus of mental health care. Patients react differently to increased demands and clinicians should be reflexive of the dimensions of individualism–relationalism in medication-free treatment services. Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03499080) on 17 April 2018.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Meland C, Dammen C. Medikamentfrie tilbud i psykisk helsevern - oppfølging av oppdrag 2015 [Medication-free services in mental health care – Follow-up of mission 2015]. In: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, editor. web: www.regjeringen.no; 2015.

2. Aksjon for medisinfrie. tilbud [User coalition for medication-free services]. Grunndokument [Position paper] [web page]. www.medisinfrietilbud.non.d. [Available from: http://medisinfrietilbud.no/grunndokument/.

3. Helse Nord [Health Region of Northern Norway]. Protokoll for medikamentfritt døgntilbud i Helse Nord [Protocol for medication-free inpatient treatment in Helse Nord]. 2016.

4. Helse. Sør-Øst [Health region of south-eastern Norway]. Overordnet protokoll for medisinfri behandling innen psykisk helsevern [Overarching protocol for medication-free treatment in mental health care]. 2016.

5. Weighing the evidence for harm from long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications: A systematic review;Sohler N;Am J Orthopsychiatry,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3