Effect of online peer support on mental health among patients of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review

Author:

Kataoka Mayumi1ORCID,Hazumi Megumi2ORCID,Usuda Kentaro1ORCID,Miyake Michi1ORCID,Nishi Daisuke3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Mental Health Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry

2. Department of Public Mental Health Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Department of Sleep-Wake Disorder, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry

3. Department of Public Mental Health Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo

Abstract

Abstract Background Psychosocial burdens of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) are an emerging public health concern. Online peer support is expected to be effective in improving the mental health of PASC patients. However, the effectiveness of these treatments remains unclear. This study investigated the effectiveness of online peer support for improving the mental health of PASC patients. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, PsycINFO/PsycArticles, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society electronic databases for studies on June 12, 2023. The inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: 1) patients with post-COVID-19 conditions over 18 years of age; 2) conducted online peer support exposure or intervention; 3) measured mental health-related outcomes using quantity scales; and 4) peer-reviewed original articles written in English or Japanese. We excluded qualitative studies that did not use quantitative scales to measure outcomes and original peer-reviewed articles. We conducted risk of bias assessments with the Risk of Bias Assessment instrument designed for non-randomized studies (RoBANS). Results A total of 157 studies were retrieved, and two met the inclusion criteria. The total numbers of participants in the two studies were 239 and 47, respectively. One was a cohort study, and the other was a pre-post study; neither had a control group. Most participants in both studies were middle-aged women or female from high-income European countries. Exposure or intervention included sharing sources of support (e.g., experiences, knowledge, and expertise) and peer support combined with workshops for the self-management of physical and mental health facilitated by trained medical experts. The effectiveness of online peer support on mental health outcomes was also assessed. Two studies reported significant improvements in work productivity, functional status, quality of life, self-efficacy, and well-being. Both studies were rated as high or unclear in most risk-of-bias domains. No meta-analysis was performed because of the small number of included studies. Conclusions Few studies examine online peer support for improving mental health-related outcomes among PASC patients, and evidence of its effectiveness is unclear. Well-designed studies are required to conduct meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of online peer support for PASC patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Post COVID-19 condition (Long COVID). World Health Organization (2022) https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/post-covid-19-condition. Accessed 12 Feb 2024

2. National Health Service. Long-term effects of COVID-19 (long COVID). National Health Service (2023) https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/covid-19/long-term-effects-of-covid-19-long-covid/. Accessed 12 Feb 2024

3. Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Alkodaymi MS;Clin Microbiol Infect,2022

4. 1-year outcomes in hospital survivors with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study;Huang L;Lancet,2021

5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 pandemic: call for research priority and action;Zeng N;Mol Psychiatry,2023

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3